[theme-reviewers] GPL and limiting usage
Chip Bennett
chip at chipbennett.net
Fri Sep 20 19:22:05 UTC 2013
This is why it matters, and why it is within our scope and
purview<http://wordpress.org/themes/about/>
:
Themes from sites that support non-GPL (or compatible) themes or violate
the WordPress community guidelines themes will not be approved.
Now, I don't believe for one second that this policy is limited to Themes,
and that non-GPL Plugins would be treated any differently. If the Plugin
subscription model represents a GPL-incompatible usage restriction, then it
should fall under this same policy, which is based on WordPress
free-software philosophy <http://wordpress.org/about/philosophy/>.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
> > I think the source of confusion stems from here: whether in the Theme,
> or in
> > a commercial Plugin, code is being distributed that *stops working*
> > (partially) if a subscription payment isn't maintained.
>
> I understand that viewpoint.
>
> However, this is the theme reviewers mailing list. So I fail to see
> how exactly is this relevant to a theme, which no longer contains this
> code, being approved for the directory or not?
>
> Are you proposing to change the guidelines such that we are now
> judging everything a developer does, regardless of where they do it?
> Because last I checked, that up-sell requirement was limited in scope
> for a reason.
>
> If I make a piece of code and release it for free, and then make
> add-ons to that piece of code and sell them separately, then at what
> point have I violated the current guidelines?
>
> -Otto
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130920/6397fc7d/attachment.html>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list