[theme-reviewers] Is it necessary to use Core Bundled Masonry?

[Emil Uzelac]

3.5 added Masonry for Custom Headers correct?

Current core bundled version of Masonry is
v2.1.05<https://github.com/desandro/masonry/releases>released year
ago,
so yep pretty darn old. We are 9 versions behind :)



On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Josh Pollock <jpollock412 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> @emil or whoever- Is there any precedent for creating a new handle for a
>> major revision of a plugin? Like maybe @rohit should have suggested that
>> masonry 3 be registered with the handle masonry3 with the old masonry
>> remaining, keeping the handle masonry?
>>
>
> Is the new version of Masonry fundamentally incompatible with the older
> version?
>
> If that's the case, I'd argue that it's unstable and should probably be
> removed from WordPress core in favor of a different library instead.
>
> -Otto
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130918/dcbbdb49/attachment.html>