[theme-reviewers] Is it necessary to use Core Bundled Masonry?
emil at uzelac.me
Wed Sep 18 23:08:25 UTC 2013
3.5 added Masonry for Custom Headers correct?
Current core bundled version of Masonry is
so yep pretty darn old. We are 9 versions behind :)
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Josh Pollock <jpollock412 at gmail.com>wrote:
>> @emil or whoever- Is there any precedent for creating a new handle for a
>> major revision of a plugin? Like maybe @rohit should have suggested that
>> masonry 3 be registered with the handle masonry3 with the old masonry
>> remaining, keeping the handle masonry?
> Is the new version of Masonry fundamentally incompatible with the older
> If that's the case, I'd argue that it's unstable and should probably be
> removed from WordPress core in favor of a different library instead.
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the theme-reviewers