[theme-reviewers] Is it necessary to use Core Bundled Masonry?

[Josh Pollock]

@emil or whoever- Is there any precedent for creating a new handle for a
major revision of a plugin? Like maybe @rohit should have suggested that
masonry 3 be registered with the handle masonry3 with the old masonry
remaining, keeping the handle masonry?


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:

> yeah, that's the only one I know :)
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Dane Morgan <dane at danemorganmedia.com>wrote:
>
>> Clear as mud. ;)
>>
>>   Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>
>>  Wednesday, September 18, 2013 16:13
>> something like this? http://codex.wordpress.org/Reporting_Bugs
>> there are instructions on this page as well :)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>   Dane Morgan <dane at danemorganmedia.com>
>>  Wednesday, September 18, 2013 15:10
>>  Chip, do you have a good resource for me to start learning how to go
>> about doing that?
>>
>>   Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>  Wednesday, September 18, 2013 15:06
>> You should submit a Trac ticket (with patch, if possible) to have the
>> core-bundled version updated.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>   Towfiq I. <tislam100 at gmail.com>
>>  Wednesday, September 18, 2013 15:04
>> +1 for the making this allowed.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Towfiq I.
>>  _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>   Rohit Tripathi <rohitink at live.com>
>>  Wednesday, September 18, 2013 15:01
>>  Here is the latest version:
>> http://masonry.desandro.com/masonry.pkgd.min.js
>> and here is the one which wordpress uses: http://pastebin.com/HtbGdtdK
>>
>> These are two really different scripts.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130918/76fcff5e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1200 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130918/76fcff5e/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1314 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130918/76fcff5e/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1616 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130918/76fcff5e/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130918/76fcff5e/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1409 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130918/76fcff5e/attachment-0004.jpg>