[theme-reviewers] Common Things Overlooked in Theme Reviews

[Dane Morgan]

I'm sorry, I had meant to ask if that could be done with scripts as 
well. I initially found it in a reference that implied that you could do 
the same thing to enqueued scripts, but I never chased it down to see how.

> Emil Uzelac <mailto:emil at uzelac.me>
> Wednesday, September 04, 2013 20:58
> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/2013-June/013545.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> Dane Morgan <mailto:dane at danemorganmedia.com>
> Wednesday, September 04, 2013 20:12
> I was wondering the same thing
>
> Josh Pollock <mailto:jpollock412 at gmail.com>
> Wednesday, September 04, 2013 19:17
> Why are the IE compatibility scripts hardcoded instead of echoed in a 
> function hooked to wp_head? I'm wondering both in terms of why 
> hardcoding is standard practice and why hooking to wp_head isn't required.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> Chip Bennett <mailto:chip at chipbennett.net>
> Wednesday, September 04, 2013 18:53
> There's not much that can be done right now, until this ticket makes 
> it into core:
> http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/16024
>
> In the meantime, those scripts can optionally be hard-coded in the 
> document head (though they could be recommended to be added via 
> callback hooked into wp_head).
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> Ulrich Pogson <mailto:grapplerulrich at gmail.com>
> Wednesday, September 04, 2013 18:35
>
> @chip what is your recommendation for including IE specific scripts in 
> the header? I am talking about the second point you mentioned.
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130904/3733af49/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1409 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130904/3733af49/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1220 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130904/3733af49/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130904/3733af49/attachment-0007.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1200 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130904/3733af49/attachment-0008.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1258 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130904/3733af49/attachment-0009.jpg>