[theme-reviewers] Common Things Overlooked in Theme Reviews

[Emil Uzelac]

http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/2013-June/013545.html


On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Dane Morgan <dane at danemorganmedia.com>wrote:

> I was wondering the same thing
>
>
> Josh Pollock wrote:
>
> Why are the IE compatibility scripts hardcoded instead of echoed in a
> function hooked to wp_head? I'm wondering both in terms of why hardcoding
> is standard practice and why hooking to wp_head isn't required.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>
>> There's not much that can be done right now, until this ticket makes it
>> into core:
>> http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/16024
>>
>> In the meantime, those scripts can optionally be hard-coded in the
>> document head (though they could be recommended to be added via callback
>> hooked into wp_head).
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Ulrich Pogson <grapplerulrich at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> @chip what is your recommendation for including IE specific scripts in
>>> the header? I am talking about the second point you mentioned.
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130904/3b445f78/attachment-0001.html>