[theme-reviewers] Using Icons for which license is unspecified

Srikanth Koneru tskk79 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 2 20:11:18 UTC 2013


http://picons.me/license.php
so many restrictions in "prohibited uses" section which will put those
icons in "not gpl compatible" box rather than "not clear" ?


On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:

> I'd have to agree, the license isn't 100% clear ... although if you can
> get a written clearer licensing statement from the icon author they may
> still be usable.
>
> Edward Caissie
> aka Cais.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>
>> License is not clear, therefore I would vote no and go with
>> http://genericons.com instead :-)
>> On Sep 2, 2013 2:32 PM, "Rohit Tripathi" <rohitink at live.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  I am willing to use the following fonts in my theme.
>>>
>>> http://picons.me/#social
>>>
>>> the license for these fonts are not specified, it just says they are
>>> free to use for personal and commercial purposes. Do these images fall
>>> under public domain, and can be used?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130903/905b1c0e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list