[theme-reviewers] DMS Update.

[Emil Uzelac]

I did not say that your thoughts are fabrication, however that specific
sentence
really sounded that way. All right, you misspoke I apologize.

Either way 5 +/- people is still not "most of the community".

Still, discussion is happening at WPORG, not around admins :)




On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:

> "I would not fabricate and say that "most of the community" agreed with
> that."
>
> Not a fabrication, perhaps I misspoke, but still my opinion either way.
> Let me clarify, of those who joined the discussion that extended about 300
> emails or so, and included dozens of voices, most people clearly stated in
> one way or another that they didn't like the model or found it unethical or
> not in compliance with the GPL or WP policy etc.
>
> There were very few voices that protested that everything was 100% on the
> up and up. Now, as we all know there are many people who read these emails
> and either don't want to voice their opinion or are afraid to. Granted, who
> knows what everyone who followed along thought for sure (which is why it's
> important for everyone to get involved), but if the voices in the
> discussion are any indication, that's what my opinion is based on.
>
> It's not like we're going to take a poll on the subject, but those are my
> thoughts, not a fabrication. Please look up the definition of fabrication
> and you'll realize that's in inappropriate and offensive word for this
> discussion.
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20131014/999a4ecf/attachment.html>