[theme-reviewers] theme update tickets queue keep too long

Design 311 hello at design311.com
Wed Oct 9 19:24:10 UTC 2013


Only started assinging tickets to myself today, so still new here.
But 100% not approved rate is not that good :D

*Design 311*
E-mail: /hello at design311.com <mailto:hello at design311.com>/
Tel: /+32 478 91 67 89/
Website: /http://design311.com <http://design311.com/>/



------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Chip Bennett
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 09, 2013 9:21PM
*To:* Discussion list for WordPress theme reviewers.
*Cc:*
*Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] theme update tickets queue keep too long

> That's not *usually* the case, though it does happen.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Design 311 <hello at design311.com 
> <mailto:hello at design311.com>> wrote:
>
>     Did 2 prio #1 tickets couldn't accept either both needed a lot of
>     work.
>     Prio #1 tickets are just as important and take just as much time
>     if done right.
>
>     *Design 311*
>     E-mail: /hello at design311.com <mailto:hello at design311.com>/
>     Tel: /+32 478 91 67 89 <tel:%2B32%20478%2091%2067%2089>/
>     Website: /http://design311.com <http://design311.com/>/
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* Chip Bennett
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, October 09, 2013 9:18PM
>     *To:* Discussion list for WordPress theme reviewers.
>     *Cc:*
>     *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] theme update tickets queue keep
>     too long
>
>>     That's an idea. However, Priority #1 tickets get less scrutiny,
>>     and I fear that they would be skimmed too lightly in the name of
>>     gaming the system.
>>
>>
>>     On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Ulrich Pogson
>>     <grapplerulrich at gmail.com <mailto:grapplerulrich at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Could we not include priority one some how? Could you check
>>         at the end of the month how many of the priority 1 the
>>         winners have done or the top 5?
>>
>>         I spent a month working on the prio 1 just to realize they
>>         were not included.
>>
>>         On 9 Oct 2013 21:12, "Chip Bennett" <chip at chipbennett.net
>>         <mailto:chip at chipbennett.net>> wrote:
>>
>>             There's no easy way to track that.
>>
>>
>>             On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Srikanth Koneru
>>             <tskk79 at gmail.com <mailto:tskk79 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                 7 priority #1 = 1 priority #2/3/4
>>
>>
>>                 On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Chip Bennett
>>                 <chip at chipbennett.net <mailto:chip at chipbennett.net>>
>>                 wrote:
>>
>>                     That would skew the numbers too much.
>>
>>
>>                     On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Srikanth Koneru
>>                     <tskk79 at gmail.com <mailto:tskk79 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                         add it to the incentive program :)
>>
>>
>>                         On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Emil Uzelac
>>                         <emil at uzelac.me <mailto:emil at uzelac.me>> wrote:
>>
>>                             you are right, I think that in past
>>                             couple of weeks #1 priority is not
>>                             prioritized
>>                             and it should be :)
>>
>>
>>                             On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Oven Zen
>>                             <zenoven at gmail.com
>>                             <mailto:zenoven at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                                 Thanks Emil, I mean too long is
>>                                 because at the time I send the first
>>                                 mail there are many tickets(about 30+
>>                                 and there were  tickets not resolved
>>                                 for 4weeks) in the theme update queue
>>                                 while the same time new theme queue
>>                                 is much shorter. And I think this may
>>                                 against the priority of each queue.
>>
>>                                 I really appreciate all reviewers
>>                                 work and that's why WordPress
>>                                 stronger. I will make more themes for
>>                                 free to the directory and I also hope
>>                                 to be a reviewer in the team
>>                                 somedays.But for now it just takes me
>>                                 too much time to think and write in
>>                                 English(this mail takes over 30
>>                                 minutes) and this is really bad.
>>
>>
>>                                 _______________________________________________
>>                                 theme-reviewers mailing list
>>                                 theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>                                 <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>                                 http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>>                             _______________________________________________
>>                             theme-reviewers mailing list
>>                             theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>                             <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>                             http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>>                         _______________________________________________
>>                         theme-reviewers mailing list
>>                         theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>                         <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>                         http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>>                     _______________________________________________
>>                     theme-reviewers mailing list
>>                     theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>                     <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>                     http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>>                 _______________________________________________
>>                 theme-reviewers mailing list
>>                 theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>                 <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>                 http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             theme-reviewers mailing list
>>             theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>             <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>             http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         theme-reviewers mailing list
>>         theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>         <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>         http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     theme-reviewers mailing list
>>     theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org  <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>     http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     theme-reviewers mailing list
>     theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>     <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>     http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20131009/07948baf/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list