[theme-reviewers] Themes that do not have category, taxonomy archive

Harish me at harishchouhan.com
Tue May 21 00:24:01 UTC 2013 

Hello,

I did a first theme review and noticed the theme to not have any Category or
Taxonomy Archive. Except on the sidebar, the theme did not display any
category or tag assigned to the post either on the Post Index or Single post
page.

Should such themes be approved or not approved?

Regards,
Harish 

-----Original Message-----
From: theme-reviewers [mailto:theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org]
On Behalf Of theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
Sent: Tue 21 May 13 05:41 AM
To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
Subject: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 36, Issue 79

Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
	theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. the_excerpt() in the loop (Stephen Cui)
   2. Re: the_excerpt() in the loop (Chip Bennett)
   3. Re: Push Live Request (Chip Bennett)
   4. Re: Push Live Request (Daniel)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 18:43:09 -0500
From: Stephen Cui <scui2005 at gmail.com>
To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
Subject: [theme-reviewers] the_excerpt() in the loop
Message-ID:
	<CANfF7QXSBT6_4cyc8WKmZ=EGKtHxGMWSnjiGarO-er-5B6-aiQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,

Just a observation: I have reviewed several themes for past weeks. It seems
that the_excerpt() become the only choice in the main lopp (e.g index.php)
for may theme authors.. I know it is not required to use the_content() in
the the guideline. I just want to know what is your thoughts on this trend?

Stephen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130520/8
cb5e603/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 19:51:39 -0400
From: Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
To: "[theme-reviewers]" <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] the_excerpt() in the loop
Message-ID:
	<CAPdLKqc=wfm=jLKcVR31ANJzwTU=_52MXurTA2q85yRe8G8rrA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Developer prerogative. As long as the single-post view displays
the_content(), then archive index views are free to use either
the_content() or the_excerpt().


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Stephen Cui <scui2005 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just a observation: I have reviewed several themes for past weeks. It 
> seems that the_excerpt() become the only choice in the main lopp (e.g
> index.php) for may theme authors.. I know it is not required to use
> the_content() in the the guideline. I just want to know what is your 
> thoughts on this trend?
>
> Stephen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130520/3
2c21496/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 20:07:40 -0400
From: Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
To: "[theme-reviewers]" <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Push Live Request
Message-ID:
	<CAPdLKqehYbnH45VB5KOONzJmocOPX738UiKjVuc6GquHq2tsvg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Post (with poll) to discuss the idea of having Priority #1 Queue tickets
reserved for Admin review:
http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2013/05/21/should-priority-1-queue-be-reser
ved-for-admin-review/


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> I'll write up something this evening on Make/Themes, and solicit 
> feedback on the idea.
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Josh Pollock
<jpollock412 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> @chip I honk that's a good idea, to make priority #1 queue reviewed 
>> by admins only. It should speed up the queue for new themes, as it 
>> would let the rest of us concentrate on that backlog. What if we try 
>> it, and if it results in a backlog of previously approved themes, or 
>> takes up too much of the admins' time, we assign 1 or 2 experienced 
>> reviewers to help them out with those reviews?
>>
>> On Monday, May 20, 2013, Zulfikar Nore wrote:
>>
>>> @Justin - that's another idea worth keeping in mind, thanks for 
>>> sharing
>>> - I'm learning new tricks as I go along :)
>>>
>>> @Chip that's a great idea on "Only Admins reviewing priority 1 que" 
>>> - the only concern would Admins being over used allover the place 
>>> i.e. review priority 1 & push live, check other reviewers reviews & 
>>> push those live, allocate tickets and maybe training new reviewers? 
>>> But if it can be worked then I'm all for it.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 12:34:38 -0500
>>> From: justin at justintadlock.com
>>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Push Live Request
>>>
>>> Also, you can download the newer version directly from .ORG.  If I 
>>> have a theme update, I change the download links on my site to the 
>>> newer version, even if it hasn't been through the review process yet.
>>>
>>> On 5/20/2013 9:35 AM, Paul Appleyard wrote:
>>>
>>> Zulf,
>>>
>>> Perhaps you can email those desperate users the update directly? 
>>> Most themes I develop are also generally available from a git hub or 
>>> bitbucket repository for direct download.
>>>
>>> Paul Appleyard
>>>
>>> On 21/05/2013 12:32 AM, Zulfikar Nore wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Admins,
>>>
>>> I know its not been 7 days since approval but can I be cheeky and 
>>> ask for these two to pushed live as the updates resolve an issue a 
>>> couple of the users are having..
>>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/12469
>>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/12479
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Zulf.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing 
>>> listtheme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.orghttp://lists.wordpress.org/ma
>>> ilman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing 
>>> listtheme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.orghttp://lists.wordpress.org/ma
>>> ilman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ theme-reviewers 
>>> mailing list theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130520/5
f91249c/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:10:34 +1000
From: Daniel <danielx386 at gmail.com>
To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Push Live Request
Message-ID:
	<CAJ5Hi2i-ssUmY5saAv0+bbwBD8hzrs2Waw=3MbyfATU9b-_R1g at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Love the idea and already voted :)

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> Post (with poll) to discuss the idea of having Priority #1 Queue 
> tickets reserved for Admin review:
>
> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2013/05/21/should-priority-1-queue-be
> -reserved-for-admin-review/
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> I'll write up something this evening on Make/Themes, and solicit 
>> feedback on the idea.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Josh Pollock
<jpollock412 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> @chip I honk that's a good idea, to make priority #1 queue reviewed 
>>> by admins only. It should speed up the queue for new themes, as it 
>>> would let the rest of us concentrate on that backlog. What if we try 
>>> it, and if it results in a backlog of previously approved themes, or 
>>> takes up too much of the admins' time, we assign 1 or 2 experienced 
>>> reviewers to help them out with those reviews?
>>>
>>> On Monday, May 20, 2013, Zulfikar Nore wrote:
>>>
>>>>  @Justin - that's another idea worth keeping in mind, thanks for 
>>>> sharing - I'm learning new tricks as I go along :)
>>>>
>>>> @Chip that's a great idea on "Only Admins reviewing priority 1 que" 
>>>> - the only concern would Admins being over used allover the place 
>>>> i.e. review priority 1 & push live, check other reviewers reviews & 
>>>> push those live, allocate tickets and maybe training new reviewers? 
>>>> But if it can be worked then I'm all for it.
>>>>
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 12:34:38 -0500
>>>> From: justin at justintadlock.com
>>>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Push Live Request
>>>>
>>>> Also, you can download the newer version directly from .ORG.  If I 
>>>> have a theme update, I change the download links on my site to the 
>>>> newer version, even if it hasn't been through the review process yet.
>>>>
>>>> On 5/20/2013 9:35 AM, Paul Appleyard wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Zulf,
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you can email those desperate users the update directly? 
>>>> Most themes I develop are also generally available from a git hub 
>>>> or bitbucket repository for direct download.
>>>>
>>>> Paul Appleyard
>>>>
>>>> On 21/05/2013 12:32 AM, Zulfikar Nore wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Admins,
>>>>
>>>> I know its not been 7 days since approval but can I be cheeky and 
>>>> ask for these two to pushed live as the updates resolve an issue a 
>>>> couple of the users are having..
>>>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/12469
>>>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/12479
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Zulf.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing 
>>>> listtheme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.orghttp://lists.wordpress.org/m
>>>> ailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing 
>>>> listtheme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.orghttp://lists.wordpress.org/m
>>>> ailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________ theme-reviewers 
>>>> mailing list theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130521/1
08ff582/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
theme-reviewers mailing list
theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers


------------------------------

End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 36, Issue 79
***********************************************

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list