[theme-reviewers] Lost my place in the queue

[Josh Pollock]

Thank you!

Maybe we should make this policy explicit somewhere to avoid this type of
situation. Also, if everyone knew this was the policy they would be more
likley to upload revisions to unreviewed themes, which should decrease the
number of issues in reviews that we have to deal with.

On Saturday, May 18, 2013, Edward Caissie wrote:

> I've re-opened the ticket for you so your place in the queue should be
> re-instated.
>
>
> Edward Caissie
> aka Cais.
>
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Josh Pollock <jpollock412 at gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'jpollock412 at gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> The original ticket for my theme had been first in the priority #2 queue
>> for the last 4 or 5 days, but was closed newer-version-uploaded today. The
>> person who closed it did not review or take ownership of the new version,
>> which was linked from the original ticket. They did close the tickets for
>> the other versions, pushing me further down the queue.
>>
>> I was under the impression that uploading a new version didn't cause the
>> theme to loose its place in the queue. I always review the latest version
>> of a theme web the original version comes up, whether the theme author left
>> a link in the original ticket or not.
>>
>> Unless I'm wrong, can someone please review my theme? I don't think it's
>> fair to make me wait an additional 2-3 weeks to come to the top of the
>> queue again.
>>
>> Latest version: http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/12308
>>
>> Also if you look at recent activity, it looks like I'm not the only one
>> who this happened to today.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Josh
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org');>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130518/56a83cc3/attachment.html>