[theme-reviewers] Second opinion request on first theme review

[Chip Bennett]

Hmm... you may be right that it didn't get added to the Codex. We added
that requirement in 3.4 or 3.5, I think?


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:43 AM, esmi at quirm dot net <esmi at quirm.net>wrote:

> on 17/05/2013 14:34 Chip Bennett said the following:
>
>  Commented in-ticket on some additional issues.
>>
>> Note: if the only issue had been the "Leave a comment" text, I would have
>> recommended marking it as "required, but can be fixed in the next Theme
>> revision". It's really pretty minor issue on its own.
>>
>
> Am I missing a guidance document? I can't see any reference to a
> requirement to wrap functions in a callback in <
> http://codex.wordpress.org/**Theme_Review<http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review>
> >.
>
>
> Mel
> --
> http://quirm.net
> http://blackwidows.co.uk
> ______________________________**_________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130517/8d116027/attachment.html>