[theme-reviewers] Theme Unit Test XML file fixed

[Chip Bennett]

Nested lists in comments is probably something that can be removed from the
Theme Unit Test, since lists aren't part of the standard list of
comment-sanitized HTML tags. I originally added nested lists to the comment
test for thoroughness, but they're a pain to maintain. :)


On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have the same problem too, imported it into the totally new WP install
> created manually.
> Also the nested lists in comments use <p> instead of <li>
>
>
> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Amy Hendrix <sabreuse at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The scheduled post is scheduled for July 27, 2030, as you can confirm
>> for yourself if you look at the raw XML in a text editor. I did
>> several fresh imports yesterday, and all of them work as expected -- I
>> suspect that something in your setup is choking on the future date and
>> failing over to Jan 1, 1970 (which is a timestamp of 0)
>>
>> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Abhik Biswas <abhik at itsabhik.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > Facing a problem with the Scheduled Post in this Theme Unit Test XML
>> file.
>> >
>> > The post is scheduled to be published on 1970, and that is probably why
>> this
>> > post got published immediately when I imported the XML file in a
>> completely
>> > new install today.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yes, its well organized and informative.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> This. The tests haven't changed; just the organization of the Posts.
>> When
>> >>> I have some spare time, I'll get the Codex page synchronized.
>> >>>
>> >>> Hopefully, the tests should be easier to step through, and a bit more
>> >>> explicit regarding what we're trying to test.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Edward Caissie
>> >>> <edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The test data may be different and test for additional use cases but
>> the
>> >>>> guidelines are still the same. Keep in mind you can even use your
>> own custom
>> >>>> data, the idea behind a "standardized" collection of test
>> posts/pages is for
>> >>>> easier communication of items that do not meet the guidelines or
>> should be
>> >>>> addressed for various and sundry other reasons. The WPTRT benchmarks
>> are in
>> >>>> the guidelines not the test data used to review the theme.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Edward Caissie
>> >>>> aka Cais.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> This test unit is completely different from the old one, Themes
>> should
>> >>>>> be compliant with this one right away or from sometime later?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Paul Appleyard <paul at spacecat.com>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> So it wasn't just me! Thanks mate.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Paul Appleyard
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 8/05/2013 6:10 AM, Lance Willett wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hi reviewers,
>> >>>>>>> New version of the Theme Unit Test XML file is ready for use. The
>> >>>>>>> previous version had a malformed XML tag that was causing a few
>> >>>>>>> issues
>> >>>>>>> in the import process.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> http://wordpress.org/support/topic/theme-unit-test-failing?replies=12#post-4171509
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Thanks to Mel (esmi), Jon Cave (duck_) and Kim Dobson for reports
>> and
>> >>>>>>> helpful info to track it down.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>>>> Lance
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130511/21c38dcd/attachment-0001.html>