[theme-reviewers] Theme Unit Test XML file fixed

[Abhik Biswas]

Hi,
Facing a problem with the Scheduled Post in this Theme Unit Test XML file.

The post is scheduled to be published on 1970, and that is probably why
this post got published immediately when I imported the XML file in a
completely new install today.


On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, its well organized and informative.
>
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> This. The tests haven't changed; just the organization of the Posts. When
>> I have some spare time, I'll get the Codex page synchronized.
>>
>> Hopefully, the tests should be easier to step through, and a bit more
>> explicit regarding what we're trying to test.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> The test data may be different and test for additional use cases but the
>>> guidelines are still the same. Keep in mind you can even use your own
>>> custom data, the idea behind a "standardized" collection of test
>>> posts/pages is for easier communication of items that do not meet the
>>> guidelines or should be addressed for various and sundry other reasons. The
>>> WPTRT benchmarks are in the guidelines not the test data used to review the
>>> theme.
>>>
>>> Edward Caissie
>>> aka Cais.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> This test unit is completely different from the old one, Themes should
>>>> be compliant with this one right away or from sometime later?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Paul Appleyard <paul at spacecat.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So it wasn't just me! Thanks mate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul Appleyard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/05/2013 6:10 AM, Lance Willett wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi reviewers,
>>>>>> New version of the Theme Unit Test XML file is ready for use. The
>>>>>> previous version had a malformed XML tag that was causing a few issues
>>>>>> in the import process.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://wordpress.org/support/**topic/theme-unit-test-failing?**
>>>>>> replies=12#post-4171509<http://wordpress.org/support/topic/theme-unit-test-failing?replies=12#post-4171509>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks to Mel (esmi), Jon Cave (duck_) and Kim Dobson for reports and
>>>>>> helpful info to track it down.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Lance
>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130511/d6a0b919/attachment.html>