[theme-reviewers] Theme Review Challenge and Second Opinion

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Wed Mar 20 01:22:13 UTC 2013

Hi Bryan,

I'll be happy to take a look at this. Can you comment in-ticket first, so
that I can follow up on your responses to the original reviewer?



On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:

> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/11498
> Theme was not approved over several misunderstandings of recommended vs
> required. A lot of this stuff we've already gone over.
> Issues for not-approved:
> - *Licensing*. All 3rd party/licensed scripts already do contain the
> proper license info. Do I still need to add a license.txt in addition?
> - *Inline Styles*. Recommended not to use, but not required. I recall
> this discussion.
> - *Site Title*. The site title does show in plain text if no logo/header
> is set. I have no problem with this in my testing, works fine.
> So, the only thing I think might need to be added is a license.txt, only
> if required in addition to the scripts themselves already containing the
> license info. Which is fine, but can I get an admin to approve this theme
> or take it over and I'll upload the new version based on your instruction.
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130319/4a047af0/attachment.htm>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list