[theme-reviewers] Priority #3 Queue
Kirk Wight
kwight at kwight.ca
Tue Mar 12 19:36:00 UTC 2013
And a huge hats off to everyone that helped get the queue to where it is; a
lot of people don't realize the wait was stretching two-three months at
some points. Thanks reviewers!
On 12 March 2013 15:28, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
> Aye Aye!
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> Good afternoon, Theme Reviewers,
>>
>> The Priority #3 Queue could use some love:
>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/report/4
>>
>> While we have no tickets older than two weeks (yay!), we have 32 older
>> than one week. It would be awesome if we could hammer on Priority #3, and
>> keep the Priority #2 Queue (tickets older than 2 weeks) empty.
>>
>> Also, our recent push got the overall queue below 50, but it's now back
>> up to around 75. I'd love to get, and keep, the queue down well under 50,
>> if we can.
>>
>> Thanks, as always, for all of your contributions!
>>
>> Chip
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130312/f80f6d05/attachment.htm>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list