[theme-reviewers] excerpt styling

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Tue Mar 5 20:30:31 UTC 2013 

Please stop replying to digest emails.

Digest emails are for *listening* only. If you wish to engage on the
mail-list - i.e. send messages, and receive replies - you need to change
your subscription NOT to receive daily digests:

1. Follow this link:
http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
2. Scroll to this line: Would you like to receive list mail batched in a
daily digest?
3. Click the radio button for "No"
4. Click "Subscribe"

Please do not continue to reply to digest emails.

Regards,

Chip


On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:23 PM, priyanshu mittal <priyanshu.mittal at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hey please help me
>
> How can we remove paragraph tags from excerpt i m only want the text of
> excerpt  how can i do this?
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:55 PM, <
> theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org> wrote:
>
>> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
>>         theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: Queue Push Update (Otto)
>>    2. Re: Denied From Commercial List (Otto)
>>    3. Re: Drop-in code library and public namespace (Slobodan Manic)
>>    4. Re: Plugin dependencies (misunderstanding) (hal-android)
>>    5. Re: Drop-in code library and public namespace (Chip Bennett)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 07:50:08 -0600
>> From: Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Queue Push Update
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> Message-ID:
>>         <CAD-Fghw=
>> Msscn_SKxeWxXVmC2pGOvuW3gv2Gj8D0eQXRn49qBA at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> It is indeed case-sensitive, however his username really is "Shelob9",
>> with the capital S.
>>
>> I suggest that you clear cookies and make sure you log in with the
>> capital letters.
>>
>> -Otto
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Josh Pollock <jpollock412 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Sorry. Works now. I will do an extra theme review as penance.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The name is case-sensitive. Last time, you said "Shelob9". :)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Josh Pollock <jpollock412 at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Still doesn't work. Can someone verify that I got added to  the
>> reviews
>> >>> group? My username is shelob9
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Modify ticket should work, try logging out and log back in once.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Josh Pollock <jpollock412 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but hwo do I assign myself a
>> >>>>> theme? I thought I could do it from modify ticket, but when I tried
>> this on
>> >>>>> an unassigned theme the only option available is "leave as new".
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Josh Pollock <
>> jpollock412 at gmail.com>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks Chip!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Chip Bennett <
>> chip at chipbennett.net>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> You're added to the "reviewers" group now. Feel free to
>> assign/close
>> >>>>>>> tickets yourself. :)
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Josh Pollock <
>> jpollock412 at gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I reviewed 1 theme twice (he resubmitted after my original
>> >>>>>>>> recommendation and the default widget debate.) The second ticket
>> is #1139
>> >>>>>>>> (http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/11399), which I
>> recommended be
>> >>>>>>>> approved but is still open.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> My username is Shelob9.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Chip Bennett <
>> chip at chipbennett.net>
>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> You're welcome to do as many as you would like or are able to
>> do.
>> >>>>>>>>> :) How many have you done now, and what's your username?
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Josh Pollock
>> >>>>>>>>> <jpollock412 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> I know that I'm still an egg, but I could commit to doing 2
>> this
>> >>>>>>>>>> week if you feel that I'm ready for that at this stage in my
>> training.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Chip Bennett
>> >>>>>>>>>> <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> We're down to only 14 tickets older than 2 weeks:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/report/3
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Anyone available to wipe out the Priority #2 queue?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Overall, we're down to 76 total tickets waiting to be
>> reviewed,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> with 217 tickets closed in the past 7 days:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nice work so far, everyone!
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Chip
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 08:09:39 -0600
>> From: Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Denied From Commercial List
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> Message-ID:
>>         <
>> CAD-Fghz951fMOmUSo1q9jOH7hmiCMg2a0-hO2jrp6fx8zQnkGg at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>> > Just briefly catching up with this thread. I think, at the very least,
>> if
>> > "have at least 3 Themes available" is an acceptance criterion, it
>> should be
>> > included in this list:
>>
>> The commercial listing is currently undergoing a revamp. You may
>> notice that the list is smaller than it was before and many new sites
>> got added (a bunch more got removed).
>>
>> Also, the "list" of criteria given on that page is not meant to be an
>> exhaustive list, nor is it set in stone. It will change as time goes
>> on.
>>
>> However, I do agree that a commercial vendor with only one theme does
>> not qualify to be on that list. I would not set the limit of number of
>> themes at any arbitrary point, such as "3", but clearly "1" is too
>> few. Here's another unlisted criteria, for example: "You have to be an
>> established theme vendor." Anybody could throw up a website and sell
>> themes in a matter of about 30 minutes. Do they get on the list too?
>>
>> WordPress.org and the people working on it will decide the contents of
>> that page using terms and criteria that we feel best helps out our
>> user-base and gives an accurate portrayal of the state of commercial
>> themes, as well as promotes the best theme-shops we can find. You're
>> free to argue about the decisions all you like, but they will continue
>> to be made using the criteria we feel are best.
>>
>> -Otto
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 17:19:04 +0100
>> From: Slobodan Manic <slobodan.manic at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Drop-in code library and public
>>         namespace
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> Message-ID:
>>         <CAN27JAkC5JCLibB5EGLgg0UKd=
>> 310bB5bJU374ewoHrvh93a8Q at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who chimed in.
>>
>> I will definitely add notes on theme's usage of Customizer Boilerplate
>> before submitting the updated version.
>>
>> Also, it's only function prefixes that are different and relevant. There's
>> also an array of sample options in this file in Customizer
>> Boilerplate<
>> https://github.com/slobodan/WordPress-Theme-Customizer-Boilerplate/blob/master/customizer-boilerplate/options.php
>> >,
>> "using" 'my_theme_textdomain' translation string, but those are just
>> sample
>> options and are not meant to be translated, but simply overwriten in
>> themes
>> function.php file.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Slobodan Manic
>> WordPress developer at *ThematoSoup* <http://thematosoup.com/>
>> Twitter: *@slobodanmanic* <https://twitter.com/#!/slobodanmanic>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > The premise behind the namespace guidelines are to help insure a few
>> > things, one being theme uniqueness.
>> > In this case, given the "drop-in" and the theme are by the same
>> > author, the issue of namespace clashing should be moot.
>> >
>> > I would be able to accept this namespace difference, perhaps adding a
>> > note to the theme's documentation explaining the difference /
>> > relevance would be helpful.
>> >
>> > Also, as noted by @Daniel, this issue has already been addressed and
>> > "drop-in" libraries are fine to use, especially since this one appears
>> > to use a unique prefix as its namespace.
>> >
>> >
>> > Edward Caissie
>> > aka Cais.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Abhik Biswas <abhik at itsabhik.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > I must have missed that.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> That is not true. Frameworks are allowed to be used unaltered;
>> that's he
>> > >> whole point of using frameworks anyway. This has been discussed
>> before
>> > >> (several times) and has been deemed acceptable. See here:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2012/03/14/theme-frameworks-and-namespacing-guidelines/
>> > >>
>> > >> Daniel
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mar 5, 2013, at 8:45 AM, Abhik Biswas wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> As long as I know, themes are *required* to use its name's slug as
>> the
>> > >> callback prefixes. Therefore,  if you are using a prefix that's not
>> your
>> > >> theme's name slug, might colide with other callbacks. Also, all the
>> > callback
>> > >> prefixes in a theme should be same and unique. You can not use
>> different
>> > >> prefixes in a single theme.
>> > >>
>> > >> A veteran reviwer can clarify it better than me.
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >>
>> > >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> > >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> > >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> > > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130305/2baa36ab/attachment-0001.htm
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 23:20:18 +0700
>> From: hal-android <hasilent00 at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Plugin dependencies (misunderstanding)
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> Message-ID:
>>         <CAJ3vVhPdf01aG0f=
>> pw27521uByPppSoGZyYGd6imw-NgPtOAog at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> @Chipbennet
>> Thank you very much, for the answer.
>> I will review that theme right away.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Hendro Prayitno
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 11:25:05 -0500
>> From: Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Drop-in code library and public
>>         namespace
>> To: "[theme-reviewers]" <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> Message-ID:
>>         <
>> CAPdLKqevOEN-4KFRJ4LW-1BAjRQG+CyXPEcdXEv8ZqFimrd9hw at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Right. We do need to use common sense here. :) If "placeholder" functions
>> intended to be filtered is properly filtered, such that the actual
>> namespacing used is correct, then there's no reason to fail the
>> "placeholder" functions. (The propriety of such "placeholder" code is
>> debatable, but IMHO outside of our scope.)
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Slobodan Manic <slobodan.manic at gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks to everyone who chimed in.
>> >
>> > I will definitely add notes on theme's usage of Customizer Boilerplate
>> > before submitting the updated version.
>> >
>> > Also, it's only function prefixes that are different and relevant.
>> There's
>> > also an array of sample options in this file in Customizer Boilerplate<
>> https://github.com/slobodan/WordPress-Theme-Customizer-Boilerplate/blob/master/customizer-boilerplate/options.php
>> >,
>> > "using" 'my_theme_textdomain' translation string, but those are just
>> sample
>> > options and are not meant to be translated, but simply overwriten in
>> themes
>> > function.php file.
>> >
>> > ---
>> >
>> > Slobodan Manic
>> > WordPress developer at *ThematoSoup* <http://thematosoup.com/>
>> > Twitter: *@slobodanmanic* <https://twitter.com/#!/slobodanmanic>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Edward Caissie <
>> edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> The premise behind the namespace guidelines are to help insure a few
>> >> things, one being theme uniqueness.
>> >> In this case, given the "drop-in" and the theme are by the same
>> >> author, the issue of namespace clashing should be moot.
>> >>
>> >> I would be able to accept this namespace difference, perhaps adding a
>> >> note to the theme's documentation explaining the difference /
>> >> relevance would be helpful.
>> >>
>> >> Also, as noted by @Daniel, this issue has already been addressed and
>> >> "drop-in" libraries are fine to use, especially since this one appears
>> >> to use a unique prefix as its namespace.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Edward Caissie
>> >> aka Cais.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Abhik Biswas <abhik at itsabhik.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > I must have missed that.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> That is not true. Frameworks are allowed to be used unaltered;
>> that's
>> >> he
>> >> >> whole point of using frameworks anyway. This has been discussed
>> before
>> >> >> (several times) and has been deemed acceptable. See here:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2012/03/14/theme-frameworks-and-namespacing-guidelines/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Daniel
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mar 5, 2013, at 8:45 AM, Abhik Biswas wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As long as I know, themes are *required* to use its name's slug as
>> the
>> >> >> callback prefixes. Therefore,  if you are using a prefix that's not
>> >> your
>> >> >> theme's name slug, might colide with other callbacks. Also, all the
>> >> callback
>> >> >> prefixes in a theme should be same and unique. You can not use
>> >> different
>> >> >> prefixes in a single theme.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A veteran reviwer can clarify it better than me.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>
>> >> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130305/ae5c5dd3/attachment.htm
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 34, Issue 84
>> ***********************************************
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130305/be8b020c/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list