[theme-reviewers] License Info

[Chip Bennett]

Looks good so far! :)


On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Stephen Cui <scui2005 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you. I did not read license.txt. Now I know I cannot assume
> license.txt is GPL specific info only.
>
> Just for my learning, how is my review on this theme so far? Hopefully I
> can do better next time.
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> I replied in-ticket for the licensing question.
>>
>> Regarding "Assigned" vs "Accepted": there is no meaningful difference
>> between the two, given the way the Theme-Trac workflow is set up. We prefer
>> "Assigned", for consistency.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Chip
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Stephen Cui <scui2005 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Chip:
>>>
>>> I noticed that you made comments on license info for this ticket:
>>>
>>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/11431
>>>
>>> Please let me know if I answered correctly. Please let me if license
>>> info is correct in his new version.
>>>
>>> BTW: What is the difference between "Assigned" and "Accepted"?
>>>
>>> Stephen Cui
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130303/942316a0/attachment.htm>