[theme-reviewers] Fwd: Plugin territory

[Chip Bennett]

I would require the text to be changed, if it says "add your analytics
code", since adding analytics code is Plugin territory.


On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:

> some are labelled "add your analytics code" and some just "add your
> header/footer scripts".
> I approved them without pointing it out as i wasn't sure of the rule.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> How do you know that the end user will use them for that?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> because they are used to add analytics scripts or similar to
>>> header/footer?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why would they?
>>>>
>>>> (Not being sarcastic; I'm honestly asking.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> do textarea field's meant for header/footer scripts fall under plugin
>>>>> territory?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Themes are always required to conform to the guidelines as current
>>>>>> when the Theme is submitted. Guidelines can and do change, and previous
>>>>>> reviews can and do miss required criteria. I would note all of the required
>>>>>> issues, and hold the ticket open to allow for developer response.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:03 PM, devcorn <wp at devcorn.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was reviewing one theme and it has so many.. many things which
>>>>>>> comes under plugin territory  shortcodes, SEO, download/upload... etc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  But the theme was previously approved, actually always approved...
>>>>>>> so I don't know what should I do with it. I don't want to disappoint the
>>>>>>> author , I can approve it with note to fix all these stuff in next version,
>>>>>>> but to my surprise. I downloaded and test old version and they had all of
>>>>>>> it.. so I don't know if I missed something as I joined WTRT last week only.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Ash
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130617/3f7d29e5/attachment.html>