[theme-reviewers] New Guy Question

[Amy Hendrix]

It looks like version 1 was accidentally left open (and thus still in
the queue) instead of being closed as it should -- there's no need to
review an older version than the most recent.

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Aaron Nimocks <aaron_nimocks at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Reviewing my first theme and I have a question.
>
> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/10451
>
> I had to fix header output error and then just peeked at the theme options
> to see that they are non existent / default theme option framework.  Which
> isn't even listed in the description so no clue why that's there.
>
> So I looked it up on trac and found a newer version.
>
> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/10577
>
> Downloaded and installed and same result as above before I even looking at
> it.
>
> Change history said the previous version was reviewed 2 times before and
> everything was fixed but I don't see any notes. Also there is 3 versions and
> 2.0 is already declined.
>
> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/query?keywords=~theme-reuben
>
> So my big question is why would I review this if the next version is already
> declined and is it typical to get submissions like this?
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>