[theme-reviewers] Regarding a Strange Behaviour

[Emil Uzelac]

@Rohit At first yes it would definitely sound fishy, however as you said
Theme was submitted by a regular Themer and no harm, no foul from
either side :)

@Christine no worries, Theme did not made to WPORG, you're all good.
Plus, Themes from the trac are usually not removed anyways.


On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Trent Lapinski <trent at cyberchimps.com>wrote:

> I apologize for any confusion, it made it into our release cycle
> prematurely, but I assure you were are working on the theme and will upload
> the completed version as soon as it is ready. We ran into a few bugs and
> had to push it’s release to next week.
>
> We’ve got a lot of new themes in the pipeline and multiple developers
> managing them, mistakes happen.
>
> Thank you for your concern.
>
> —Trent
> CEO of CyberChimps Inc.
> http://cyberchimps.com
>
> On Thursday, December 12, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Srikanth Koneru wrote:
>
> I think the name "Parallax" should not be allowed as its a popular slider
> technique and we have a a rule saying such names should not be allowed.
> But many themes with bootstrap in their names are approved.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Rohit Tripathi <rohitink at live.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bryan,
>
> Thanks for clearing that up, and I apologize for the misunderstanding.
> Looking forward to your theme (Y)
>
> Cheers,
> Rohit Tripathi
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:21:16 -0700
> From: bhadaway at gmail.com
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Regarding a Strange Behaviour
>
>
> Yeah, it's happened to me a few times where I wanted to use a name and
> there was a dead, never approved theme blocking it. I tried to have it
> cleared, but the admins couldn't or wouldn't do it at that time, I don't
> know if that's changed, but this has been discussed a few times before and
> the conclusion each time was that's just the way it is, first come, first
> serve.
>
> Unless it's a trademarked name that no one else can use anyways, I think
> along with how plugins and themes are removed from search and have a
> warning attached after 2 years of abandonment, they should also be eligible
> for replacement by other developers if someone wants to claim its slug. An
> email could be sent out to the theme or plugin author on file and if they
> don't reply and update the theme or plugin within a week it's opened up.
>
> But, with any suggestion for improvement, who knows what can of worms this
> can open up.
>
> _______________________________________________ theme-reviewers mailing
> list theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20131212/b54ec10a/attachment.html>