[theme-reviewers] Tags and description.

[Emil Uzelac]

We could add few more subject I think, just like
http://i.imgur.com/erCnAUR.png did.


On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> I think, the vast majority of the time, an "industry" tag is just
> marketing nonsense. What is it about a Theme's design that makes it
> particularly useful to one, specific industry versus another specific
> industry? I can see the case for "Business" in general (because a design
> that emphasizes a business site can logically be quite distinct from a
> design that emphasizes blogging, or a portfolio, or a news/magazine, etc.),
> but not specific industries.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Azizur Rahman <prodevstudio at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I think we need more then just "tags".
>>
>> Take the following tags for example:
>> "Responsive, E-Commerce, Business, Portfolio, News/Magazine, Video,
>> Accessibility."
>>
>> Above tags are useful from a developer point of view but are they useful
>> for end users? They are mixture of industry and theme features. They are
>> two distinct taxonomies.
>>
>> I am sure end user would benefit form having industry specific
>> categories/tags or something that are aligned with some of the popular
>> theme market places. We do not need to go wholesale with marketplaces but
>> something in that direction.
>>
>> Just my two cents.
>>
>> On Friday, 23 August 2013, Ulrich Pogson wrote:
>>
>>>  @Chip I like where you are taking this.
>>>
>>> @Emil What list?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23 August 2013 21:10, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nice, thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, so :
>>> Responsive, E-Commerce, Business, Portfolio, News/Magazine, Video,
>>> Accessibility.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>
>>> accessibility
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>> He can add these i guess :
>>> Responsive, E-Commerce, Business, Portfolio, News/Magazine, Video.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>
>>> @Ulrich, do you still keep the list?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, Business/Corporate is one tag that is needed badly.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Justin Tadlock <
>>> justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I definitely agree, Chip.
>>>
>>> I wanted to focus on a set of meaningful tags that described "types" of
>>> themes though.  We've kind of taken a single tag,  e-commerce, and ran with
>>> it (with some good ideas too).
>>>
>>> Here's one of my favorite tags:
>>> http://wordpress.org/themes/tags/photoblogging
>>>
>>> I think a good first step would be for us to come up with similar,
>>> useful tags for users that describe the types of themes they can download.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/23/2013 1:48 PM, Chip Bennett wrote:
>>>
>>> I definitely see benefit in a both/and approach, rather than either/or,
>>> to "e-commerce" and "plugin-support-{plugin}" tags. And in all honesty,
>>> getting a generic "e-commerce" tag approved is probably easier and more
>>> feasible in the short-term.
>>>
>>>  But I'd still like to see some standard way for Themes to declare that
>>> support, since if the "e-commerce" tag is added, a reviewer is going to
>>> have to verify the tag is appropriate. A simple add_theme_support(
>>> 'plugin-name' ) call would meet that requirement very nicely.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Justin Tadlock <
>>> justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm re-posting this because my last email went to moderation for file
>>> size.  I'm not s
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Kind Regards,
>> Azizur Rahman
>>
>> ----
>> Do you need cost-effective web hosting solution and Domain name try
>> http://prodevstudio.com
>>
>> Missed the last Friday Khutbah, try catchup a Khutbah on-line now at
>> http://fridaykhutbah.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130823/e6aae32d/attachment.html>