[theme-reviewers] Tags and description.

[Ulrich Pogson]

Amy, you are right. If this was added to the Theme-Check it would make life
easier for us.

Here is the GitHub link if anyone is intrested.
https://github.com/Pross/theme-check

I have added Chip's comments to the table here. I still need feedback on
"microformats" tag.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgFnu461m-SOdFlwS0cwWXVyRkJKeHVvY3pJbTIzc3c&usp=sharing


On 22 August 2013 19:23, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> think that support for even a single post format (e.g. a Gallery Theme) is
>> valid here.
>>
>> It depends if you count the default post format or not?
>>
>>
> The "default" post format (i.e. "standard") is not actually a post format.
> There is no "default" or "standard" term defined for the post_format
> taxonomy. It is merely the fallback if no post format is defined.
>
>>
>>
>>  (Note: "Text Domain" header tag is not used and not required; it is
>>> information-only, and optional.)
>>
>>
>> It is used for translating the theme description and page template page.
>> See this article<https://foxnet-themes.fi/2013/07/02/translating-custom-page-template-names/>.
>> Responsive has the page templates translated in German if any one wants to
>> test it.
>>
>>
> Huh; you learn something new every day!
>
> (Otto/Pross: should this be added to Theme Check, as a corollary test for
> add_theme_textdomain()?)
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130822/c13fb06b/attachment.html>