[theme-reviewers] Tags and description.

[Emil Uzelac]

Theme URI, Author URI is more than enough. As far as the tags, there
will/might be responsive-width.
On Aug 21, 2013 1:32 AM, "Daniel" <danielx386 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Not even a link to support on WPORG?
>
> On 8/21/13, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
> > There will be no support link. Once proposed by me, which today I see not
> > needed and completely useless. We have free system, free hosting for our
> > Themes, support can be handled from WPORG.
> > On Aug 21, 2013 1:02 AM, "myazalea" <myazalea at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Any chance we can start a proper discussion perhaps on the blog about
> >> what
> >> tags we want to add (or edit, clarify or remove) and then present it to
> >> the
> >> thx38 with some sort of unity ;)
> >> Or do we need to wait until the project has developed further, keeping
> an
> >> open mind on how tags will be used.
> >>
> >> Also, we need some guidelines on what is actually allowed in the
> >> description. Do links need to be author or theme uri?
> >>
> >> Perhaps a support link could be added to the stylesheet. This would not
> >> be
> >> needed if themes had what plugins do *jelous glare*. ;)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Skickat från min Samsung Mobil
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Daniel Fenn
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130821/ca7cee97/attachment.html>