[theme-reviewers] Author URI guidelines

Tue Aug 6 15:54:43 UTC 2013

Automattic = above our pay grade.

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:52 AM, devcorn <wp at devcorn.com> wrote:

> I don't agree, how you will justify http://wordpress.org/themes/untitled from
> Automattic
>
> and sitegroud is well known company and they have pretty good themes.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>
>> No. A hosting company is not a Theme shop.
>>
>> A Theme shop is a company for which the sole/primary purpose is to
>> develop and distribute Themes.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Jose Castaneda <jomcastaneda at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> so by that a hosting company would also be considered an
>>> extension/exception.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is a Theme Shop not a logical extension/exception to the "personal
>>>> site" requirement for Author URI?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Jose Castaneda <jomcastaneda at gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> and neither is a theme-shop....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> A Realtor site is, by definition, not a "personal" site.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Jose Castaneda <
>>>>>> jomcastaneda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is a 'personal' site.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "That person took time from their schedule to create something to
>>>>>>>> share with a community."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What *person*? How is a Realtor site a "person"? That's the issue.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Jose Castaneda <
>>>>>>>> jomcastaneda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sorry but I don't fully see how it is a 'sponsored by' link. That
>>>>>>>>> person took time from their schedule to create something to share with a
>>>>>>>>> community. It would be like a photographer using his portfolio since that
>>>>>>>>> is what the theme author does. The guideline states: personal website or
>>>>>>>>> project/development site.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, a realtor site wouldn't be valid as Author URI. That would
>>>>>>>>>> essentially be a "sponsored by" or spam link. (It shouldn't take a great
>>>>>>>>>> deal of imagination to understand how that has, can, and would be exploited
>>>>>>>>>> if the rule were otherwise.)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> AuthorURI is intended to link to the *person* who
>>>>>>>>>> developed/distributed the Theme. Theme shops are perfectly fine, because
>>>>>>>>>> Theme shops develop and distribute Themes. A realtor site does not.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Jose Castaneda <
>>>>>>>>>> jomcastaneda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So a realtor site wouldn't be if the author is a realtor? Sorry
>>>>>>>>>>> the line does seems to be a little odd at times. Like @mario says it is a
>>>>>>>>>>> bit of a subjective decision.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Srikanth Koneru <
>>>>>>>>>>> tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Theme shops, personal websites and project websites are allowed
>>>>>>>>>>>> as author url and everything else isn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Jose Castaneda <
>>>>>>>>>>>> jomcastaneda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have to ask as well since I've seen other themes use
>>>>>>>>>>>>> themeshops for their author credit links as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Mario Peshev <mario at peshev.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chip, could I personally ask for some clarifications on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guidelines page - either in make/themes or in the Codex under Theme Review
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or wherever, like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Licensing.2C_Theme_Name.2C_Credit_Links.2C_Up-Sell_Themes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/guidelines/guidelines-license-theme-name-credit-links-up-sell-themes/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tend to disagree so often with most subjective decisions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that I'd really love to actually have them better defined than what is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in there, especially with the contradictions with some of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existing themes in the repository.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mario Peshev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Chip Bennett <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Ola Łączek <ola at bodera.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a theme that uses this address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.siteground.com/ as author URI and for credit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link in footer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In guidelines it says that "*For AuthorURI, emphasis is on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the personal nature of the site*".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I think this link is not acceptable, am I right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ola Łączek
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130806/c7c876fd/attachment-0001.html>