[theme-reviewers] Author URI guidelines

Tue Aug 6 15:45:44 UTC 2013

Is a Theme Shop not a logical extension/exception to the "personal site"
requirement for Author URI?

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Jose Castaneda <jomcastaneda at gmail.com>wrote:

> and neither is a theme-shop....
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>
>> A Realtor site is, by definition, not a "personal" site.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Jose Castaneda <jomcastaneda at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> It is a 'personal' site.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>
>>>> "That person took time from their schedule to create something to share
>>>> with a community."
>>>>
>>>> What *person*? How is a Realtor site a "person"? That's the issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Jose Castaneda <jomcastaneda at gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry but I don't fully see how it is a 'sponsored by' link. That
>>>>> person took time from their schedule to create something to share with a
>>>>> community. It would be like a photographer using his portfolio since that
>>>>> is what the theme author does. The guideline states: personal website or
>>>>> project/development site.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No, a realtor site wouldn't be valid as Author URI. That would
>>>>>> essentially be a "sponsored by" or spam link. (It shouldn't take a great
>>>>>> deal of imagination to understand how that has, can, and would be exploited
>>>>>> if the rule were otherwise.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AuthorURI is intended to link to the *person* who
>>>>>> developed/distributed the Theme. Theme shops are perfectly fine, because
>>>>>> Theme shops develop and distribute Themes. A realtor site does not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Jose Castaneda <
>>>>>> jomcastaneda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So a realtor site wouldn't be if the author is a realtor? Sorry the
>>>>>>> line does seems to be a little odd at times. Like @mario says it is a bit
>>>>>>> of a subjective decision.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Theme shops, personal websites and project websites are allowed as
>>>>>>>> author url and everything else isn't.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Jose Castaneda <
>>>>>>>> jomcastaneda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have to ask as well since I've seen other themes use themeshops
>>>>>>>>> for their author credit links as well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Mario Peshev <mario at peshev.net>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Chip, could I personally ask for some clarifications on the
>>>>>>>>>> guidelines page - either in make/themes or in the Codex under Theme Review
>>>>>>>>>> or wherever, like
>>>>>>>>>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Licensing.2C_Theme_Name.2C_Credit_Links.2C_Up-Sell_Themes:
>>>>>>>>>>  or
>>>>>>>>>> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/guidelines/guidelines-license-theme-name-credit-links-up-sell-themes/
>>>>>>>>>>  ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I tend to disagree so often with most subjective decisions that
>>>>>>>>>> I'd really love to actually have them better defined than what is already
>>>>>>>>>> in there, especially with the contradictions with some of the existing
>>>>>>>>>> themes in the repository.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mario Peshev
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Chip Bennett <
>>>>>>>>>> chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Ola Łączek <ola at bodera.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a theme that uses this address:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.siteground.com/ as author URI and for credit link
>>>>>>>>>>>> in footer.
>>>>>>>>>>>> In guidelines it says that "*For AuthorURI, emphasis is on the
>>>>>>>>>>>> personal nature of the site*".
>>>>>>>>>>>> So I think this link is not acceptable, am I right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ola Łączek
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130806/73037689/attachment-0001.html>