[theme-reviewers] Coding Standard

Tue Apr 30 14:13:46 UTC 2013

Okay you're right, there are use cases where shortcodes should be allowed
and are allowed as far as I remember. But most likeley they are used by
theme developers to create user content.

I can see your point that a phrase which forbid them totally would be too
hard, but then maybe just a phrase that Shortcodes and CPTs which generate
user content are not allowed, because they stuck users to a certain theme.

Perhaps there is really no need for another rule, but a better explanation
of the existing one would be nice. Just a small hint would be enough, which
explains that theme authors have to pay attention by implementing
shortcodes and CPTs, because they often slid quickly into plugin
territority with their theme features.

Best Regards,
Thomas

2013/4/30 Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net>

>   They stumble over it because it’s the reviewers determination to
> whether or not they warrant being in a plugin and not in the theme.
>
>  It’s not a black and white.
>
>  Jeeze, imagine a single plugin for a theme that does an output of theme
> content in a shortcode that’s specific for that theme, .. uh what use is
> that ?
>
>  seriously.
>
>
>
>  *From:* Thomas from ThemeZee <contact at themezee.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 30, 2013 2:07 AM
> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Coding Standard
>
>    Hi everybody,
>
> in my opinion the Guidelines should clearly point out that Shortcodes and
> Custom Post Types are not allowed to use in themes. This is a point where
> both reviewers and theme authors often stumble over.
>
> I know we have the passage: "Since the purpose of Themes is to define the
> presentation of user content, Themes must not be used to define the
> generation of user content, or to define Theme-independent site options or
> functionality."
>
> But most people misinterpret this passage or overread it or maybe don't
> realize what it means - I don't know - but we had the discussion about
> Shortcodes and CPTs a lot lateley. I had to ask about it a few weeks ago
> and I have contributed some themes to the directory a long time before.
>
> The Guidelines already contain a clear phrase that TimThumb is not
> allowed, I would suggest that there is a similiar phrase in the Guidelines
> which forbid shortcodes and CPTs.
>
> Best Regards,
> Thomas
>
>
> 2013/4/29 Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>
>> This.
>>
>> The Guidelines - i.e. the things that are *required* - are in one place
>> only: the Theme Review Codex page:
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review
>>
>> The Make/Themes site is used to discuss the guidelines; if anything is
>> formalized, it will be added to the Codex page. There are things that we
>> occasionally miss, so if you have any specific Guidelines that were decided
>> on the Make/Themes site, but not added to the Codex, please bring them up,
>> and we'll make sure the Codex is accurate.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Chip
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Amy Hendrix <sabreuse at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If that's a common occurrence (and I haven't been reviewing enough
>>> lately to know how common it really is), then that's a MAJOR problem.
>>> The Make site is where changes to the guidelines are *discussed*, but
>>> it's the nature of such discussions that not all points that are
>>> discussed are actually adopted as guidelines.
>>>
>>> To put it bluntly, reviewers, please DO NOT say things are required if
>>> they aren't actually required in the Review Guidelines. Passing the
>>> review process is difficult already; we absolutely need to have a
>>> clear and consistently enforced set of guidelines. There are enough
>>> complaints out there that the guidelines are arbitrary and constantly
>>> changing without people saying things are required when they're not.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > can't recall any instantly, but reviewers usually point to make site
>>> and
>>> > state that its a required issue even tough its not mentioned on org
>>> > guidelines.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> What policies, specifically?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> A few policies are formulated on make site but they don't make it to
>>> >>> guidelines on .org
>>> >>> so these policies are only recommended then?
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Yes. At the moment, the Coding and CSS standards are only
>>> *recommended*.
>>> >>>> Making them *required* may be a bridge we cross at some point, but
>>> we're not
>>> >>>> there right now.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> If this does not cause any issues, I would say recommended.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Emil
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Cui <scui2005 at gmail.com>
>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Hi,
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> During the theme review, my theme has a "required issue" for next
>>> >>>>>> version:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> There are inconsistency in spacing around parenthesis throughout
>>> the
>>> >>>>>> theme. Recommend to read the WordPress? PHP coding standards.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> http://make.wordpress.org/core/handbook/coding-standards/php/#space-usage
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> I have no problem to make such changes as it is good practice. I
>>> also
>>> >>>>>> take the chance to revisit the code.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> My question is " is it required?" or "just recommended".
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Regards
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Stephen
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> >>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> >>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> >>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> >>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> >>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> >>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130430/2efb63c7/attachment-0001.html>