[theme-reviewers] No Test Themes
Doug Stewart
zamoose at gmail.com
Thu Apr 4 13:41:09 UTC 2013
Small nit:
One salts the ashes, one doesn't use the ashes to salt.
Unless we're being eco-friendly and reusing our ashes. In which case:
LEEDS-compliant pillaging!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
> There's no point to doing so.
>
> If somebody starts to spam the themes trac, then we'll block them... and
> burn the world down around them while salting the earth with the ashes that
> remain.
>
> So far, this isn't a big deal. No need to make a big deal out of it.
>
>
> -Otto
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Jonny <wp at stormfire.eu> wrote:
>>
>> It may be an idea to ask otto to block search engines from indexing the
>> trac, I see no reason why it can't or shouldn't be done.
>>
>>
>> On 4 Apr 2013, at 00:33, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've seen a couple of Google Alerts kick back references to trac so I
>> would say it is indexed
>> ... and if it was up to me and I was in a bad mood the author would be
>> banned for this as well.
>>
>> Definitely unacceptable.
>>
>> Edward Caissie
>> aka Cais.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>
>>> good to know :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Jose Castaneda <jomcastaneda at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think some do. A few weeks ago I did a search and was linked to a trac
>>>> theme. I would think it varies on the terms being used.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think so, however the point was not to do this regardless :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does the trac get indexd by search engines? Could this be the new seo
>>>>>> trick? (no pun intended)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/4/13, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>>>> > Please don't do this:
>>>>>> > http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/11936
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Daniel Fenn
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
--
-Doug
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list