[theme-reviewers] CC-BY listed as acceptable in review guidelines

[Kirk Wight]

Whew! Thanks – I was getting scared we were going to have to start one of
*those* threads again :)

I think licensing threads are right up there with "but Twenty Eleven does
it!" threads...

On 21 September 2012 19:23, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> Wait; I'm hopped up on meds, and not thinking clearly. Reverting the
> reversion to your change. :)
>
> Chip
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> If I'm reading the change history correctly, please note the section:
>> *FONT* licenses.
>>
>> CC-By is deemed to be acceptable for bundled fonts.
>>
>> I've reverted the change.
>>
>> Thanks for keeping an eye on changes to the Theme Review guidelines,
>> though!
>>
>> Chip
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Kirk Wight <kwight at kwight.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed this evening that CC-BY was listed as accepted in the Review
>>> Guidelines ("Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY)"). I've gone
>>> ahead and removed it, as I think we decided that was not the case; see this
>>> thread:
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/2011-March/004506.html
>>>
>>> Do any admins know otherwise?..
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120921/d763236b/attachment-0001.htm>