[theme-reviewers] What do you think of this author url

[Emil Uzelac]

sorry Bryan*

On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:

> Brian,
>
> Cais is admin, Simon is admin I'm admin and you're not seeing the big
> picture here at all. Please check the comments in the ticket once again :)
>
> Oh yes, not to forget, let's do some reviews instead of wasting time and
> waiting on who is gonna post what!
>
> Thanks,
> Emil
>
>
>
>
> Are you personally going to check this site and see if the content stays
> the same? or you are just throwing stuff around?
>
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is ridiculous. Why is this even up for discussion any more? The name
>> is legit, the site is legit, the theme is legit. In any case, Chip, an
>> admin, has spoken on the subject. This just sounds personal and petty.
>> Don't be subjective, be objective.
>>
>> Doesn't matter what the domain has been through in the past, that happens
>> sometimes. Frankly, the behavior of some on the review team going to great
>> lengths to investigate this matter seems more questionable than this
>> person's choice in a URL/site/brand name which is really none of our
>> business anyways. Can you say witch hunt?
>>
>> If anyone denies this theme based solely on it's name/URL (given that you
>> only subjectively don't get it or otherwise disagree with it) as apposed to
>> it actually having design or function flaws you're ethically wrong, period
>> and this is what will need to be examined further. As Chip said which
>> anyone with half a sense agrees with, words have many meanings, especially
>> from culture to culture or even person to person, especially creatives.
>> Look at how many words we simply make up on a daily basis.
>>
>> If this is somehow found to be spam later, remove it. It's hardly
>> creating a precedence for spammers, who's going to know, who's going to
>> care? Look at the scrutiny that's already put on the themes, look at how
>> many themes even make it into the repo in the first place. I think the
>> world of WordPress theme reviews will be fine.
>>
>> Thanks, Bryan
>>
>>
>> Bryan Phillip Hadaway
>>
>>
>> Web & Graphic Designer
>> calmestghost.com
>> bhadaway at gmail.com
>>
>>
>> *Socialize:* Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/calmestghost> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/calmestghost> |
>> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/calmestghost> | Google+<https://plus.google.com/104582075016689917593>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:00 PM, <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes its a dangerous precedent.
>>>
>>> Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com>
>>> Sender: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org
>>> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 15:59:38
>>> To: <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> Reply-To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] What do you think of this author url
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120909/f356803f/attachment.htm>