[theme-reviewers] Theme Review guidelines @ Codex

[Otto]

The rollback worked fine. Check the history:

http://codex.wordpress.org/index.php?title=Theme_Review&action=history

Emil: I can't lock it without locking it for, essentially, everybody.
Since this is an infrequent issue, I suggest just reverting it if
somebody mucks it up again. Happens all the time on wikipedia.

-Otto


On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Edward Caissie
<edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
> It still looks messy ... :(
>
>
> Cais.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>>
>> Whoever @Karahrathmell is, he/she messed all up today. "Contribution" was
>> reverted back to Chip.
>>
>> @Otto, if you're around, can we please "lock" this up somehow?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Emil
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Vicky Arulsingam
>> <vicky.arulsingam at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is the page supposed to have all this CSS code?
>>>
>>>
>>> http://codex.wordpress.org/index.php?title=Theme_Review&oldid=122354#Required_Hooks_and_Navigation
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Vicky Arulsingam
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>