[theme-reviewers] GPL-compatible icon fonts, all in one place

[Emil Uzelac]

Good share, no doubt about it :)

Emil


On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:

> They have been around, but they've been scattered hither and yon. I was
> mainly excited about the fact that they're a) all in one place and b)
> glyph-selectable, so you can build your own fontface and avoid having to
> pull them all down on every page load. Buffet line of glyphs.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>
>> nice, but not new, they have been around for some time now ;)
>>
>> Emil
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> No worries -- I saw the "GPL-compatible" and got unreasonably excited.
>>> *grin*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Kirk Wight <kwight at kwight.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ha! You're right – I see CC-BY and get all upset :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 14 November 2012 15:23, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And you're wrong -- with the exception of the two licensed
>>>>> CC-BY/CC-BY-SA, all of those are compatible. There are SIL-, BSD- and
>>>>> MIT-licensed fonts there aplenty.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Kirk Wight <kwight at kwight.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No, no, no, no.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Each font family has its own license; only the ones licensed as SIL
>>>>>> would be considered GPL-compatible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14 November 2012 15:12, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seen via @_mfields just moments ago:
>>>>>>> http://fontello.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Huzzah!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> -Doug
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> -Doug
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Doug
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Doug
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20121114/c847a9f7/attachment.htm>