[theme-reviewers] GPL-compatible icon fonts, all in one place

[Kirk Wight]

Ha! You're right – I see CC-BY and get all upset :)

On 14 November 2012 15:23, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:

> And you're wrong -- with the exception of the two licensed CC-BY/CC-BY-SA,
> all of those are compatible. There are SIL-, BSD- and MIT-licensed fonts
> there aplenty.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Kirk Wight <kwight at kwight.ca> wrote:
>
>> No, no, no, no.
>>
>> Each font family has its own license; only the ones licensed as SIL would
>> be considered GPL-compatible.
>>
>> On 14 November 2012 15:12, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Seen via @_mfields just moments ago:
>>> http://fontello.com/
>>>
>>> Huzzah!
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Doug
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Doug
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20121114/fc3c1421/attachment.htm>