[theme-reviewers] jQuery

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Wed May 30 21:48:46 UTC 2012


I agree, too. I think adding wp_dereigster_script() to Theme Check would be
a great idea. My only question: is there *ever* a legitimate use of
wp_deregister_script()? If so, we can add it as INFO; if not, we can just
go ahead and add it as REQUIRED. But, I want to be sure we've considered
any unintended consequences before doing so.

Chip

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:33 PM, esmi at quirm dot net <esmi at quirm.net>wrote:

> on 30/05/2012 22:01 Emil Uzelac said the following:
>
>> Also see:
>> http://wpdevel.wordpress.com/**2011/12/12/use-wp_enqueue_**
>> scripts-not-wp_print_styles-**to-enqueue-scripts-and-styles-**
>> for-the-frontend/<http://wpdevel.wordpress.com/2011/12/12/use-wp_enqueue_scripts-not-wp_print_styles-to-enqueue-scripts-and-styles-for-the-frontend/>
>>
>
> I am *so* not arguing against any of this but it does seem to me that the
> relevant themes could be weeded out at the mandatory checks/upload point. I
> assume the Theme Check plugin is based on the mandatory checks, yes?
>
>
> Mel
> --
> http://quirm.net
> http://blackwidows.co.uk
> ______________________________**_________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120530/4ddc1e4e/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list