[theme-reviewers] Themes based on other themes

Wed May 30 12:02:27 UTC 2012

Just one more thing Dan, when posting to this list could you please create
a new email rather then replying to the digests.
On May 30, 2012 12:54 PM, "Central Victorian Irish Association" <
info at cvia.com.au> wrote:

> Thanks Jay.
> That's what I figured alright. Just wanted to make sure. :)
>
> Cheers,
> Dan
>
> -----Original Message----- From: theme-reviewers-request at lists.**
> wordpress.org <theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 9:45 PM
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Subject: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 24, Issue 80
>
> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> theme-reviewers-request at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> theme-reviewers-owner at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>  1. Re: Figerty Theme (Central Victorian Irish Association)
>  2. Twenty Eleven Theme (Tuan Pickard)
>  3. Themes based on other themes (Central Victorian Irish Association)
>  4. Re: Twenty Eleven Theme (jay Cauvain)
>  5. Re: Themes based on other themes (jay Cauvain)
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**----------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 22:14:51 +1000
> From: "Central Victorian Irish Association" <info at cvia.com.au>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Figerty Theme
> To: <theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> >
> Message-ID: <**8513E15598B14E14AE143B179737E0**93 at DannoLapTop>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Hi guys/gals
>
> Yeah Doug, I ran it through there. The only issues (if issues at all) it
> disclosed were Recommendations. Now, anyone who is submitting for the first
> time would see these as simply Recommendations or Suggestions. I certainly
> did and when the theme was refused on these grounds, that's when I got
> frustrated.
> In saying that, I do apologise for my frustration. I am not usually like
> that at all. I have since corrected the issues outlined in the review and
> have resubmitted the theme. It now awaits review. :P
> I have also joined the WPTRT and have been busy today doing themes because
> I
> had an easy day at work. :P
>
> I do agree that the Theme Check plugin should be pushed on developers to
> use
> before submitting themes. It should be mandatory for them to install the
> plugin and the test data too and test before submitting.
>
> God Bless.
> Dan (figerty).
>
> -----Original Message----- From: theme-reviewers-request at lists.**
> wordpress.org <theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 10:00 PM
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Subject: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 24, Issue 79
>
> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> theme-reviewers-request at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> theme-reviewers-owner at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>  1. Re: Figerty Theme (Chip Bennett)
>  2. Re: Figerty Theme (Doug Stewart)
>  3. Re: Figerty Theme (jay Cauvain)
>  4. Re: Figerty Theme (Otto)
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**----------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:36:17 -0500
> From: Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Figerty Theme
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CAPdLKqdUAdgNMvtY2UDGXijj1biW**n7aRrkBfCGqQ39NEtcxbWQ at mail.**gmail.com<CAPdLKqdUAdgNMvtY2UDGXijj1biWn7aRrkBfCGqQ39NEtcxbWQ at mail.gmail.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> There used to be a "resources" section on the Theme Review Codex page, but
> it has since been moved elsewhere. The Theme Review page is intended to be
> the Guidelines, and *only* the Guidelines.
>
> That said: if you follow through to the Theme Unit
> Tests<http://codex.wordpress.**org/Theme_Review<http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review>>Codex
> page, you'll see a
> link to How To Join WPTRT:
>
> Read How To Join
> WPTRT<http://make.wordpress.**org/themes/about/how-to-join-**wptrt/<http://make.wordpress.org/themes/about/how-to-join-wptrt/>
> >,
> and follow all test-environment setup instructions
>
>
> The setup instructions on How To Join WPTRT includes a step to install
> Theme Check. :)
>
> Chip
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Central Victorian Irish Association
>> <info at cvia.com.au> wrote:
>> > Well,
>> > Kind of pointless trying to argue the point isn't it? Especially, from
>> what
>> > you tell me, your own theme (twentyten) is not compliant but yet
>> > released
>> > with WordPress.
>> > But never mind, my frustration only comes from my passion to make a
>> > contribution to Open Source and not towards those who do not have that
>> > passion.
>> > I will fix the "Recommended" issues and resubmit it. I won't be holding
>> my
>> > breath though.
>> >
>> > Have a good day.
>> > Dan
>> >
>>
>> Dan:
>> Did you run your theme through the Theme Check plugin by any chance?
>>
>> Theme review team:
>> I note that the submission page and the Codex articles don't seem to
>> call out the Theme Check plugin as an excellent way to avoid these
>> sorts of developer frustrations. Is there a particular reason we avoid
>> pushing this valuable tool so as to save theme devs a few headaches?
>>
>> --
>> -Doug
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>
>>  -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**
> attachments/20120528/edaa240e/**attachment-0001.htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120528/edaa240e/attachment-0001.htm>
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:52:49 -0400
> From: Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Figerty Theme
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CANFh3d43_**Ljiy4tGYucdRKnYNcJTOyJsaNNkz8e**T9VVN=SoKdw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Right, but not all theme devs think "Oh, I should join TRT" and thus
> miss out on that info. I think this is one of those cases and thus we
> ought to think about adding a link, prominently, to the submission
> process.
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
>
>> There used to be a "resources" section on the Theme Review Codex page, but
>> it has since been moved elsewhere. The Theme Review page is intended to be
>> the Guidelines, and *only* the Guidelines.
>>
>> That said: if you follow through to the Theme Unit Tests Codex page,
>> you'll
>> see a link to How To Join WPTRT:
>>
>> Read?How To Join WPTRT, and follow all test-environment setup instructions
>>
>>
>> The setup instructions on How To Join WPTRT includes a step to install
>> Theme
>> Check. :)
>>
>> Chip
>>
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Central Victorian Irish Association
>>> <info at cvia.com.au> wrote:
>>> > Well,
>>> > Kind of pointless trying to argue the point isn't it? Especially, from
>>> > what
>>> > you tell me, your own theme (twentyten) is not compliant but yet
>>> > released
>>> > with WordPress.
>>> > But never mind, my frustration only comes from my passion to make a
>>> > contribution to Open Source and not towards those who do not have that
>>> > passion.
>>> > I will fix the "Recommended" issues and resubmit it. I won't be holding
>>> > my
>>> > breath though.
>>> >
>>> > Have a good day.
>>> > Dan
>>> >
>>>
>>> Dan:
>>> Did you run your theme through the Theme Check plugin by any chance?
>>>
>>> Theme review team:
>>> I note that the submission page and the Codex articles don't seem to
>>> call out the Theme Check plugin as an excellent way to avoid these
>>> sorts of developer frustrations. Is there a particular reason we avoid
>>> pushing this valuable tool so as to save theme devs a few headaches?
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Doug
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Doug
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:01:23 -0700
> From: jay Cauvain <wp at stormfire.me>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Figerty Theme
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CAPq7n5kJESLCaxH-**H50db9BoFnLnNFfZOEtWuEjcE+**x1XSyAwA at mail.gmail.com<CAPq7n5kJESLCaxH-H50db9BoFnLnNFfZOEtWuEjcE%2Bx1XSyAwA at mail.gmail.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I think the plugin link should be included in the guidelines themselves,
> under best practices.
>
> Just my 2p
> On May 28, 2012 11:53 PM, "Doug Stewart" <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Right, but not all theme devs think "Oh, I should join TRT" and thus
>> miss out on that info. I think this is one of those cases and thus we
>> ought to think about adding a link, prominently, to the submission
>> process.
>>
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>> > There used to be a "resources" section on the Theme Review Codex page,
>> but
>> > it has since been moved elsewhere. The Theme Review page is intended to
>> be
>> > the Guidelines, and *only* the Guidelines.
>> >
>> > That said: if you follow through to the Theme Unit Tests Codex page,
>> you'll
>> > see a link to How To Join WPTRT:
>> >
>> > Read How To Join WPTRT, and follow all test-environment setup
>> instructions
>> >
>> >
>> > The setup instructions on How To Join WPTRT includes a step to install
>> Theme
>> > Check. :)
>> >
>> > Chip
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Central Victorian Irish Association
>> >> <info at cvia.com.au> wrote:
>> >> > Well,
>> >> > Kind of pointless trying to argue the point isn't it? Especially,
>> >> > from
>> >> > what
>> >> > you tell me, your own theme (twentyten) is not compliant but yet
>> >> > released
>> >> > with WordPress.
>> >> > But never mind, my frustration only comes from my passion to make a
>> >> > contribution to Open Source and not towards those who do not have
>> >> > that
>> >> > passion.
>> >> > I will fix the "Recommended" issues and resubmit it. I won't be
>> holding
>> >> > my
>> >> > breath though.
>> >> >
>> >> > Have a good day.
>> >> > Dan
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Dan:
>> >> Did you run your theme through the Theme Check plugin by any chance?
>> >>
>> >> Theme review team:
>> >> I note that the submission page and the Codex articles don't seem to
>> >> call out the Theme Check plugin as an excellent way to avoid these
>> >> sorts of developer frustrations. Is there a particular reason we avoid
>> >> pushing this valuable tool so as to save theme devs a few headaches?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -Doug
>> >> ______________________________**_________________
>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ______________________________**_________________
>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Doug
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>
>>  -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**
> attachments/20120528/99815009/**attachment-0001.htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120528/99815009/attachment-0001.htm>
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:01:40 -0500
> From: Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Figerty Theme
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CAD-FghzpRAf_**QSB28mSr38qyziR2+**zpCdqgsMKYhZR1XEh-99A at mail.**gmail.com<CAD-FghzpRAf_QSB28mSr38qyziR2%2BzpCdqgsMKYhZR1XEh-99A at mail.gmail.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I think it would be useful for the header section of
> http://codex.wordpress.org/**Theme_Review<http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review>to at least have a link to
> some other page that lists resources/tools/other links for theme
> authors to take note of. Don't need a resources section on that page
> itself, but if there's another page with that info, linking to it
> would be nice.
>
> -Otto
>
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
>
>> There used to be a "resources" section on the Theme Review Codex page, but
>> it has since been moved elsewhere. The Theme Review page is intended to be
>> the Guidelines, and *only* the Guidelines.
>>
>> That said: if you follow through to the Theme Unit Tests Codex page,
>> you'll
>> see a link to How To Join WPTRT:
>>
>> Read?How To Join WPTRT, and follow all test-environment setup instructions
>>
>>
>> The setup instructions on How To Join WPTRT includes a step to install
>> Theme
>> Check. :)
>>
>> Chip
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Central Victorian Irish Association
>>> <info at cvia.com.au> wrote:
>>> > Well,
>>> > Kind of pointless trying to argue the point isn't it? Especially, from
>>> > what
>>> > you tell me, your own theme (twentyten) is not compliant but yet
>>> > released
>>> > with WordPress.
>>> > But never mind, my frustration only comes from my passion to make a
>>> > contribution to Open Source and not towards those who do not have that
>>> > passion.
>>> > I will fix the "Recommended" issues and resubmit it. I won't be holding
>>> > my
>>> > breath though.
>>> >
>>> > Have a good day.
>>> > Dan
>>> >
>>>
>>> Dan:
>>> Did you run your theme through the Theme Check plugin by any chance?
>>>
>>> Theme review team:
>>> I note that the submission page and the Codex articles don't seem to
>>> call out the Theme Check plugin as an excellent way to avoid these
>>> sorts of developer frustrations. Is there a particular reason we avoid
>>> pushing this valuable tool so as to save theme devs a few headaches?
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Doug
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>
>
> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 24, Issue 79
> *************************************************
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:49:55 +0200
> From: Tuan Pickard <tuanpickard at gmail.com>
> Subject: [theme-reviewers] Twenty Eleven Theme
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CA+NmhzY=6rEERaMF9LQ7Fdoi5O1s**Pb5Wwpe+A4j-Bkn4-UgjFg at mail.**gmail.com<6rEERaMF9LQ7Fdoi5O1sPb5Wwpe%2BA4j-Bkn4-UgjFg at mail.gmail.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi There,
>
> I am using WordPress 3.3.2 and have installed the WordPress Twenty Eleven
> theme. I have been playing around with the Custom Header options and have
> loaded seven of them, I cannot load any more and assume that seven is the
> limit, how do I delete them? Removing the Header Image doesn't seem to
> work. Or should I simply reload WordPress?
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Tuan Pickard
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**
> attachments/20120530/d24d0ec3/**attachment-0001.htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120530/d24d0ec3/attachment-0001.htm>
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 21:03:23 +1000
> From: "Central Victorian Irish Association" <info at cvia.com.au>
> Subject: [theme-reviewers] Themes based on other themes
> To: <theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> >
> Message-ID: <**7D5FC8687DAE4F39A747000DE8FEEF**79 at DannoLapTop>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Good morning/evening/afternoon/**night/chtistmas etc.
> Just a question.
> I am reviewing a theme at the moment that is evidently based on TwentyTen
> and I have run it through the Theme Check. Everything seems fine except it
> indicates on every single file that TwentyTen Text Domain is being used.
> Is this allowed or should it be declined on this? I am under the
> impression that if a theme is based on TwentyTen, or any theme at that,
> that it is no longer TwentyTen and should contain no mention of it.
> Your feedback oh great masters of WordPressing is appreciated.
> Cheers,
> Dan
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**
> attachments/20120530/6e8d4266/**attachment-0001.htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120530/6e8d4266/attachment-0001.htm>
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 04:43:27 -0700
> From: jay Cauvain <wp at stormfire.me>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Twenty Eleven Theme
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CAPq7n5kEoj5-**9pmGB3M0hEfrJ3TNoMNUGRXx4ii2UY**KouSadeA at mail.gmail.com<CAPq7n5kEoj5-9pmGB3M0hEfrJ3TNoMNUGRXx4ii2UYKouSadeA at mail.gmail.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> please asks support questions in the support forums, the list is not
> intended for that purpose.
> On May 30, 2012 10:50 AM, "Tuan Pickard" <tuanpickard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Hi There,
>>
>>  I am using WordPress 3.3.2 and have installed the WordPress Twenty
>> Eleven theme. I have been playing around with the Custom Header options
>> and
>> have loaded seven of them, I cannot load any more and assume that seven is
>> the limit, how do I delete them? Removing the Header Image doesn't seem to
>> work. Or should I simply reload WordPress?
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>>
>> Tuan Pickard
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>
>>
>>  -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**
> attachments/20120530/ca3cfd9c/**attachment-0001.htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120530/ca3cfd9c/attachment-0001.htm>
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 04:45:06 -0700
> From: jay Cauvain <wp at stormfire.me>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Themes based on other themes
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CAPq7n5mre0AJb7HaihGbzoqbyuCJ**APxY8rUfJ5O8kBOnKP9Kdg at mail.**gmail.com<CAPq7n5mre0AJb7HaihGbzoqbyuCJAPxY8rUfJ5O8kBOnKP9Kdg at mail.gmail.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> The theme needs to be rejected, and all instances of the text domain need
> to be changed.
> On May 30, 2012 12:03 PM, "Central Victorian Irish Association" <
> info at cvia.com.au> wrote:
>
>   Good morning/evening/afternoon/**night/chtistmas etc.
>>  Just a question.
>> I am reviewing a theme at the moment that is evidently based on TwentyTen
>> and I have run it through the Theme Check. Everything seems fine except it
>> indicates on every single file that TwentyTen Text Domain is being used.
>> Is this allowed or should it be declined on this? I am under the
>> impression that if a theme is based on TwentyTen, or any theme at that,
>> that it is no longer TwentyTen and should contain no mention of it.
>>  Your feedback oh great masters of WordPressing is appreciated. [image:
>> Smile]
>>  Cheers,
>> Dan
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>
>>
>>  -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**
> attachments/20120530/3674d204/**attachment.htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120530/3674d204/attachment.htm>
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>
>
> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 24, Issue 80
> *************************************************
> ______________________________**_________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120530/62d84f12/attachment-0001.htm>