[theme-reviewers] GPL-compatible social media icon sets
Otto
otto at ottodestruct.com
Thu May 10 23:14:11 UTC 2012
The line "you can download and use wherever you like, for free as
well" is a statement of intent, certainly, however he only talks about
"use". You also need to be concerned with re-distribution.
It's probably the author's intent to essentially say that they
disclaim any rights to the icons, but if they don't actually say that
anywhere, then it's somewhat bad form to assume it from a poorly
worded statement.
This is why we have pre-made licenses, folks. If you say "it's CC0" or
"it's BSD" or "it's GPL", then you're at least being clear about
things.
-Otto
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Syahir Hakim <khairulsyahir at gmail.com> wrote:
> Can we bundle any resources that are not licensed under a well-known,
> GPL-compatible licence? I mean, I know a lot of icon sets are "free to use
> for whatever purposes", including the one I used previously from this site:
> http://www.nouveller.com/general/free-social-media-bookmark-icon-pack-the-ever-growing-icon-set/
>
> However, in my last theme update submission I was informed that I need to
> change the bundled icon set since it was not released under any explicit
> licence. It was stated in the page linked to above that "you can download
> and use wherever you like, for free as well!". Furthermore, what's to
> prevent the icon designers to simply whack that line off their page?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Syahir Hakim
>
>
> On 11/05/2012 9:58 a.m., Bruce Wampler wrote:
>
> This is a very high quality, complete social icon set. I don't think I've
> seen it in any of the links here, or some of the referenced links:
>
> http://icondock.com/free/vector-social-media-icons
>
> I would think that its license is GPL compatible - it doesn't require
> anything. The site says:
>
> License Info
>
> Free to use for whatever purposes. If you use these icons, an optional link
> to http://icondock.com would be appreciated. Thank you.
>
>
> I don't think an "optional link" voilates GPL. There are really no
> restrictions I can read into this license.
>
> Bruce Wampler
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list