[theme-reviewers] Theme Reviwers

[Sayontan Sinha]

>
> Do we need to continue our "discussion" ? ;)
>

By all means go ahead. As I said, your links give examples of
*repeated*styles, which I am not disputing. As I pointed out in my
previous post, for
a style used only once, an inline style is less bloat, akin to the Hello
World patterns example. (I had a much longer text written about repeated
vs. non-repeated styles in one of my prior posts, but I deleted it because
I wanted to shorten the mail)

Anyway, I don't believe I am going to convince or be convinced, so this is
the end of my contribution to this thread. Feel free to thrust this as a
"REQUIRED" item for theme approval if you feel that is the best recourse. I
still believe that enforcing "No inline styles" is dogmatic and without
appropriate technical merit, but I am probably in a minority of 1.

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:

> And to add and possibly finish this up:
> http://www.websiteoptimization.com/secrets/web-page/replace-inline-style.htmlwas published in
> http://www.amazon.com/dp/0596515081/?tag=websiteoptimi-20 as well ;) Do
> we need to continue our "discussion" ? ;)
>
> Thanks,
> Emil
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120504/8a787115/attachment.htm>