[theme-reviewers] Why the double standards and why Pagelines gets special treatment?

[Emil Uzelac]

To all parties involved in this drama, as an admin (and others will agree)
I am forced to moderate this specific and any other similar so called
discussions.

   - There will be no more attacks on Theme Reviewers (*Daniel is one of
   them just FYI*)
   - Stop calling out admins and other people on
   theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org list
   - Do not take any personal vendettas against anyone, especially our
   reviewers, admins, stuff and the authors
   - Have any issues after everything was explained to "you" in details,
   stop submitting your Theme(s) to repository

I've personally had enough of this nonsense. List is no longer available to
anyone with these "questions". If "you" continue I'll personally
unsubscribe you from theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org list.

This is real and personal abuse of our reviewers and other people as well!

Keep it clean,
Emil


On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Satish Gandham <satish.iitg at gmail.com>wrote:

> @Daniel Tara
>
> *******I don't understand what's so difficult to grasp about asking and
> receiving a weaver from the guidelines.*******
>
> Those special cases aren't necessary for the functioning of the theme
> their only purpose is to brand their theme.
>
> I asked for an exception on base64encode as my themes import/export
> function depends on it. I never got any exception.
>
>
> This thread is about double standards and favoritism
>
> 1. You yourself pointed that page lines clearly violates the GPL terms.
> Yet they continue to be in the repository. While my theme was suspended
> with in one day of notice.
>
> 2. I was asked to rewrite my code as I was using two db entries to store
> options, but page lines is allowed to use 6
>
> 3. I was asked to remove the fav icon, and page lines is allowed to enable
> their fav icon by default.
>
> 4. How can you allow themes to rebrand wordpress login page without user
> consent?
>
> 5. We are not allowed to hot link images on the options page because of
> privacy reasons.
>      How can you trust the developer in not using the hot linked images
> for tracking?
>      If you trust him, why not trust others?
>
>
> All I'm asking for is fair rules and transparency.
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120327/ba332c97/attachment.htm>