[theme-reviewers] Why the double standards and why Pagelines gets special treatment?
jay Cauvain
wp at stormfire.me
Sun Mar 25 17:24:53 UTC 2012
This is starting to smell like a witch-hunt
On Mar 25, 2012 6:16 PM, "Trent Lapinski" <trent at cyberchimps.com> wrote:
>
> I'm curious, but doesn't the store API in the PageLines theme not also
> violate the phoning home policy?
>
> If analytics for themes is not allowed, how can a proprietary online store
> selling potentially non-GPL plugins and themes be built directly into a
> theme not be a violation of this policy?
>
> -- Trent Lapinski
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Mar 25, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Simon Prosser <pross at pross.org.uk> wrote:
>
> >> When Simon Prosser is violating so many theme review guidelines in his
> theme, (the most serious one being the replacement of wordpress logo on wp
> login page >with theirs), how can he be the theme admin?
> >
> > For the last time Satish, I have NOT 'admined' anything for approx one
> > whole YEAR.
> > I am only posting on this list because my name was mentioned.
> >
> > Maybe you should contact the admins instead of churning this over and
> over.
> >
> > On 25 March 2012 16:43, yulian yordanov <yul.yordanov at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Guys,
> >> I think you are trying to treat one special case like a common theme.
> It's
> >> an exception, not the rule-maker.
> >>
> >> Fingli
> >>
> >> На 25 март 2012, 18:04, Satish Gandham <satish.iitg at gmail.com> написа:
> >>>
> >>> @Simon Prosser
> >>> It would make a lot of things clear if you answer all the questions i
> >>> asked rather than picking one and ridiculing it.
> >>>
> >>> When other themes cannot hotlink images why should your theme get an
> >>> exception?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> More over the special consideration was only for top-level menu as you
> >>> said previously (Which you never clarified why you need a top level
> menu)
> >>>
> >>> ********The only issue was the menu, permission was asked, considered
> then
> >>> granted by the admins ( not me i may add )*******
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> @theme admins
> >>> Can you please explain the reason behind this rule
> >>>
> >>> *******Themes are required to include within the Theme all images,
> >>> scripts, and other bundled resources. Such resources must not be
> "hotlinked"
> >>> from a third-party site.*******
> >>>
> >>> When Simon Prosser is violating so many theme review guidelines in his
> >>> theme, (the most serious one being the replacement of wordpress logo
> on wp
> >>> login page with theirs), how can he be the theme admin?
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Yulian Yordanov
> >> post-scriptum.info
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > My Blog: http://pross.org.uk/
> > Plugins : http://pross.org.uk/plugins/
> > Themes: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/pross
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120325/1011ec68/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list