[theme-reviewers] Custom implementation of required hooks

[Edward Caissie]

If the function does behave as Konstantin is stating (still untested) I
agree with Chip, a patch is definitely in order ... or the documentation
needs to be much more clear.


Cais.


On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> I understand your question now. :)
>
> I agree that the markup output by wp_link_pages() is... lacking. However,
> I would much rather see a core patch to improve the default markup than
> have Themes roll their own custom markup.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chip
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Konstantin Obenland <obenland at gmx.de>wrote:
>
>> I have a question concerning wp_link_pages().
>> In the codex, the function is listed under "Required Hooks and
>> Navigation" (
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Required_Hooks_and_Navigation).
>> Would it be okay for a theme to provide the same functionality, but with
>> a custom implementation?
>> In this case it's echoing it as an unordered list, which can't be
>> achieved through passing arguments to wp_link_pages().
>>
>> Looking forward to your insights,
>> Konstantin
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120311/a376c5f8/attachment.htm>