[theme-reviewers] Custom implementation of required hooks

[Chip Bennett]

I understand your question now. :)

I agree that the markup output by wp_link_pages() is... lacking. However, I
would much rather see a core patch to improve the default markup than have
Themes roll their own custom markup.

Thanks,

Chip

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Konstantin Obenland <obenland at gmx.de>wrote:

> I have a question concerning wp_link_pages().
> In the codex, the function is listed under "Required Hooks and Navigation"
> (http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Required_Hooks_and_Navigation).
> Would it be okay for a theme to provide the same functionality, but with a
> custom implementation?
> In this case it's echoing it as an unordered list, which can't be achieved
> through passing arguments to wp_link_pages().
>
> Looking forward to your insights,
> Konstantin
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120310/87f745ae/attachment-0001.htm>