[theme-reviewers] What happened here?

[Mats Birch]

We all make mistakes, especially when new, so no blame on anyone.
It all worked out very well indeed!
And blindingly fast, too!  :-)

Yes, I thought as much as if you do incorporate something that is 
recommended, you should do it the right way. That is obvious. I do it 
everywhere, I believe. Until the next reviewer finds something...  :-)


On 2012-03-09 00:07, Emil Uzelac wrote:
> No, Theme reviewer is not and should not be disconnected from this or 
> any other ticket. Previously approved tickets should have at least 2 
> day grace period, where reviewer will place the Theme on hold till all 
> requirements are fixed. If and when the Theme is not-approved it will 
> not go back in #1 priority.
>
> Theme is recommended to incorporate the following WordPress core 
> features, but is not required to do so. However, if incorporated, 
> features must support the core WordPress implementation: I hate to say 
> this but it was wrong to say that custom header, background are required.
>
> For this reason only ticket should be re-opened and make sure that 
> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Theme_Features is followed by 
> the reviewer.
>
> Cheers,
> Emil
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Mats Birch <birch at birchware.se 
> <mailto:birch at birchware.se>> wrote:
>
>     I've got a question for you, who know how these things work.
>
>     I just upgraded my theme, and got a "not approved" review. I am a
>     bit curious, because none of the things remarked upon have been
>     changed since the previous version were approved, with no mentions
>     of those things.
>
>     How did that happen?
>
>     I of course fixed, within an hour, most of it, and commented on
>     the ticked, asking if I had done enough.
>     I got no answer.
>     Is that because a reviewer is disconnected from a ticket once they
>     closed it?
>
>     Anyway, I uploaded it anyway (what else to do?) and, much to my
>     surprise, I found it in the "Priorty 3 queue", last of the last,
>     so to speak. Wouldn't it be smoother if the reviewer could check
>     the new one while he/she sort of knows it?
>
>
>     The theme's last ticket is:
>     http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/6839
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     theme-reviewers mailing list
>     theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>     <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>     http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120309/237c7b02/attachment-0001.htm>