[theme-reviewers] Child Themes
Edward Caissie
edward.caissie at gmail.com
Mon Jul 9 15:55:12 UTC 2012
I just read your comment. Thanks for the support ... and testing!
Writing the code was easy enough but testing it out where I am right ...
now not so much.
Cais.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Amy Hendrix <sabreuse at gmail.com> wrote:
> Commented on the ticket. Thanks for updating!
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Edward Caissie
> <edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Alright ... updated patch added to ticket. Support (and testing) from the
> > WPTRT would probably help to get this further along than what it has.
> >
> >
> > Cais.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Edward Caissie <
> edward.caissie at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I think I have the new/updated patch ready ... I'll get it updated
> >> shortly.
> >>
> >>
> >> Cais.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Amy <sabreuse at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, I hear you there!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Jul 9, 2012, at 9:37 AM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> @Amy - I would have really liked to see version checking get in when I
> >>> proposed it back at 3.1!?!
> >>>
> >>> I'll try to get a look at this week though ...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cais.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Amy Hendrix <sabreuse at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> @Cais, I'd really (REALLY) like to see version-check get in to 3.5, if
> >>>> you're interested in updating the patch to work with WP_Theme. It
> >>>> might be easier to get it in now while they're still closing random
> >>>> small bugs, rather than waiting until after the scope has been set.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Edward Caissie
> >>>> <edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > @Emil - As Otto pointed out he was the first one to place a
> >>>> > Child-Theme in
> >>>> > the repository ... and the reason I was able to add the two I
> >>>> > currently have
> >>>> > there. Thanks.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Also, I still need to get back to reviewing those patches. I believe
> >>>> > the new
> >>>> > WP_Theme class will affect how they might be implemented now.
> >>>> > Otherwise,
> >>>> > we're going to need more than "that's neat" to get the buy-in we
> need
> >>>> > from
> >>>> > the devs to have them committed.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Cais.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Color is fantastic, great choice for sure. Oh sorry I didn't know
> >>>> >> about
> >>>> >> that. Cool now we know.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> I wasn't aware of the button at all and it's very useful.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Emil
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com>
> >>>> >>> wrote:
> >>>> >>> > P.S. Cais is the very first author with the Child Theme in
> >>>> >>> > repository
> >>>> >>> > as
> >>>> >>> > well.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Actually, that would be me, via Matt's account. :)
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> The first child theme in was
> >>>> >>> http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/mazeld, because I was testing
> >>>> >>> things. It is.. not a good example to learn from. I was new to
> .org.
> >>>> >>> Sorry. :(
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> I'll fix it up and make it not so horrible, one of these days. The
> >>>> >>> random image thing in the header is kinda neat though. So, you
> know,
> >>>> >>> there is that. ;)
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> -Otto
> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > _______________________________________________
> >>>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>> >
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120709/ed41306a/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list