[theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues

[Edward Caissie]

PS ...

If the idea of having a few volunteers be separated out to address a
specific queue or what not is going to be looked at I would much prefer
they work from a more proper FIFO list simply taking the oldest open ticket
(one at a time) and GTD.


Cais.


On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Edward Caissie
<edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:

> The essential premises of the Trac review priority is still one of FIFO
> (First-In First-Out).
> The ideas behind the Priority queues was to facilitate quicker reviewers
> of known themes; and to help identify themes for reviewers so they are
> aware of any history that may be involved.
>
> For example a custom query such as this one:
> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/query?owner=&status=new&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=time&col=changetime&order=timeshows a list of all open tickets (168 at the moment) where the one at the
> top should be the prime priority theme. The Priority queues were introduced
> to quickly pick out those themes (ideally previously approved in their last
> submission) to pick the "low hanging fruit".
>
>
> Cais.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Chandra Maharzan <maharzan at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> This would be great. I haven't seen queue 2, 3 moving at all for a long
>> time. :)
>>
>> 2012/1/26 futeng.org <bbq at futeng.org>:
>> > I hope so!
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------ Original ------------------
>> > From: "Kirk Wight";
>> > Date: 2012年1月26日(星期四) 晚上10:25
>> > To: "theme-reviewers";
>> > Subject: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
>> >
>> > Hello reviewers,
>> >
>> > I'm wondering if we should consider splitting reviewers between some
>> > different queues, just to keep all queues moving.
>> >
>> > I haven't seen queue 1 empty yet myself since the "getting back on
>> track"
>> > changes in December. I've also noticed that queue 1 can get a bit
>> dominated
>> > if submitters are quite active (no fault of their own - obviously we
>> need to
>> > keep encouraging regular updates to themes).
>> >
>> > Maybe, for now, we could assign a reviewer to each of queues 2, 3 and
>> 4, and
>> > everyone else plugs away as always?
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> cmans
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120126/48e0c952/attachment.htm>