[theme-reviewers] enqueuing style.css

[Kirk Wight]

That's what I thought too. And it's just so darned easy to stick it in
there with the comment-reply script, which is required to be handled that
way anyways.


On 3 February 2012 12:13, Amy Hendrix <sabreuse at gmail.com> wrote:

> Either that reviewer was mistaken, or your acquaintance misunderstood
> what they were told:
>
> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Including_Stylesheets_and_Scripts
>
> Themes may optionally link the default stylesheet (style.css) directly
> in the document head, or via wp_enqueue_style()Themes are required to
> enqueue all stylesheets and scripts, using
> wp_enqueue_style()/wp_enqueue_script(), and hooked into an appropriate
> hook via callback function, rather than hard-coding stylesheet/script
> links or tags in the template.
>
> Themes are recommended to hook stylesheet and script enqueue callbacks
> into `wp_enqueue_scripts`
>
> Themes may optionally link the default stylesheet (style.css) directly
> in the document head, or via wp_enqueue_style()
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Kirk Wight <kwight at kwight.ca> wrote:
> > I met a fellow last night that said a theme reviewer told him style.css
> had
> > to be linked directly in header.php, and couldn't be enqueued through
> > wp_enqueue_scripts, like this:
> >
> > add_action('wp_enqueue_scripts', 'themeslug_enqueue_scripts_styles');
> >
> > function themeslug_enqueue_scripts_styles() {
> >    wp_enqueue_style( 'themeslug-styles', get_stylesheet_uri() );
> > }
> >
> >
> > Is this the case?..
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120203/48a17158/attachment.htm>