[theme-reviewers] Heads up - Bootstrap icons are not GPL

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Thu Feb 2 22:24:02 UTC 2012


That would be a mal-applied CC license. (The CC By attribute does not
require a public back-link, although MANY developers misconstrue it as
such.)

Regardless: no CC license (except for CC0, or public domain) is
GPL-compatible.

Chip

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Amy Hendrix <sabreuse at gmail.com> wrote:

> Nope. They're using the Glyphicons set (license terms at
> http://glyphicons.com/glyphicons-licenses/) which requires a backlink
> and restricts further redistribution of the set.
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Azizur Rahman
> <prodevstudio+wordpress at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Since Bootstrap is Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0,
> > which I assume the icons are includes since its not explicitly
> > mentioned.
> >
> > And from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_License#GPL_compatibility
> >
> > "a project combining GPL version 3 and Apache License 2.0 code will
> > need to be licensed under the GPL version 3"
> >
> > So Icons can be included as long as the theme is GPL v3.
> >
> > Please correct me if I am on the wrong track here.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Azizur
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
> >> Licensing information, including a link to the GNU-accepted list of
> >> GPL-compatible licenses, is fully documented in the Theme Review
> Guidelines
> >> in the Codex:
> >> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Licensing
> >>
> >> Personally, I would like to see a bit of flexibility with respect to
> bundled
> >> resources such as images/fonts/etc., for which GPL-compatibility is not
> as
> >> critical as it is with functional Theme code. But, until we are given
> that
> >> leeway, we operate under the 100% GPL-compatible policy. Thus, merely
> >> stating that a resource is "free for personal and commercial use" isn't
> >> sufficient as GPL-compatible.
> >>
> >> Chip
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Alex Mansfield <
> alex at sackclothstudios.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> What are the exact rules for licenses? I believe that Creative Commons
> >>> is not compatible with the GPL, but what about Apache, MIT licenses
> >>> etc. Also, what about icons that are "free for personal and commercial
> >>> use" but don't contain any licensing at all? I'm confused.
> >>>
> >>> Alex
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:22 AM, George Mamadashvili
> >>> <georgemamadashvili at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Thanks Emil
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> approved!
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Not all no I will check in the morning. Thanks for Bootstrap
> update.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Feb 2, 2012 2:03 AM, "George Mamadashvili"
> >>> >>> <georgemamadashvili at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Emil
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> I think that theme is base on Bootstrap v1, and icons were added
> in
> >>> >>>> v2
> >>> >>>> (released 1 February)
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> p.s. I commented in Trac Ticket Review Queue 3 days ago and my
> still
> >>> >>>> waiting moderation, is just me or all comments are moderated?
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> If I am not mistaking there are one or two Bootstrap Themes in
> trac
> >>> >>>>> right now, that should be checked for icons.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> On Feb 1, 2012 10:35 PM, "Emil Uzelac" <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> Thanks Amy that is good to know!
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> On Feb 1, 2012 10:15 PM, "Amy Hendrix" <sabreuse at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> A heads up from Mark Jaquith on Twitter:
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> Note that if you're making a Bootstrap-based WordPress theme
> for
> >>> >>>>>>> redistribution, it *cannot* include the icons (not GPLv3
> >>> >>>>>>> compatible).
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> (original:
> >>> >>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/markjaquith/status/164923778202214400)
> >>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>> >>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> >>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> >>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>> >>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> >>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> >>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>> >>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> >>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> >>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>> >
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120202/31e324e1/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list