[theme-reviewers] Question about guideline - Admin Pointers

[Daniel Fenn]

Even putting in something like "(also known as feature pointers)"

Regards,
Daniel Fenn




On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it alright if I edit the codex and add in what you said? Or will it
> just make the page too long?
>
> Regards,
> Daniel Fenn
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> Admin pointers are the pop-up messages displayed in the WP-Admin. You
>> primarily see them when core uses them to highlight new features in a new
>> version of WordPress.
>>
>> Also known as "feature pointers", they were introduced in WordPress 3.3:
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_3.3
>>
>> More info:
>>
>> http://wpengineer.com/2272/how-to-add-and-deactivate-the-new-feature-pointer-in-wordpress-3-3/
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Chip
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> It ben quite some time since I've looked at the guideline and there
>>> something that I don't quite understand.
>>>
>>> It states
>>>
>>> Theme *must not* incorporate the following features:
>>>
>>> Admin Pointers
>>>
>>> Can someone please explain what that mean?
>>>
>>> I'm sorry if this already bee coveredsomewhere.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Daniel Fenn
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20121216/983926c9/attachment.htm>