[theme-reviewers] how to make reviewing faster
Bernard Latanowicz
bernard.latanowicz at gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 21:43:06 UTC 2012
I see your point.
Maybe 121 reviewed themes in last 7 days is not a bad result.
I believe you tried such idea as mine and maybe you're right. It was
just my idea, so I'd like to thank you for the discussion.
I know many of people don't update themes because of laziness. I've got
too much work and other duties as well. But I know there are plenty of
people with short-lived enthusiasm.
Have a nice day/evening/night*
Bernard
* delete as appropriate :-)
W dniu 2012-12-13 21:48, Emil Uzelac pisze:
> I don't think that we're in position of classifying anyone lazy.
>
> What we need is more Themes and leave the updates to their authors.
>
> Any Theme that does not get updated over the certain period won't
> show in the search anyways and if they're found via Google for
> example, this is what user will see
> <http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/default>:
>
> People contribute for many reasons, but they're not required
> to keep Themes up to date no, that is 110% up to them.
>
> Not to sound rude or anything and that's not my intention here, but
> I have to say that we should get involved here
> <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/> first, that's what
> will speed up the process for sure and give you better understand
> what we're dealing with.
>
> And once again, we don't believe in lazy, that's not even in our
> dictionary :)
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Bernard Latanowicz
> <bernard.latanowicz at gmail.com <mailto:bernard.latanowicz at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Chip and Bryan.
>
> I've beend thinking about it as well.
> But a reviewer with higher priviliges could check the review
> before closing it. The "younger reviewer" will earn points only if
> the "older reviewer" approves his work.
>
> I know some people could say - I'm too lazy to test or I'm too
> awesome for testing, so I screw uploading my awesome theme.
>
> But guys, if WP has lazy developers it will become a huge garbage
> than repository.
> There are a lot of themes and plugins with 1.0 version or which
> haven't been updated for months and years. Plenty of times I
> noticed bugs on forums and guess what. Nothing. Is that what we
> really want?
>
> Do we need few developers or a lot of fame-wanted lazy people?
>
> Bernard
>
>
> W dniu 2012-12-13 20:50, Bryan Hadaway pisze:
>> "Why not to have a rule - if you want to add your theme, first
>> you must review one (or more)."
>>
>> 1. Because theme authors are already contributing work for the
>> community. They're /already/ donating their time, work and effort
>> for free, they should not have to do anything else. This would be
>> like paying someone $10 so that you have the privilege of buying
>> them a $5 hamburger, just doesn't make sense.
>>
>> 2. Besides the fact that the community would simply miss out on
>> the potential themes from authors who said "Screw that.", of the
>> ones that did review, they would likely be one-off, half-assed
>> reviews, just enough to get by. I've seen similar methodologies
>> attempted in other review forums, "You must review a website
>> before your website can be reviewed." and it's just a waste of
>> time quality wise.
>>
>> Current wait time for review: 2 months
>> Wait time for your theme to go live once it's been approved:
>> About a week
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20121213/ee74ffa5/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list