[theme-reviewers] GPL

[Bryan Hadaway]

Okay, so...

Otto: Says yes to Public Domain
Daniel: Says no to Public Domain

I don't want to open another can of worms so I'll just give up on the idea
and stick with GPL for WP-based projects, since that of course we know is
accepted.


Bryan Phillip Hadaway


Web & Graphic Designer
calmestghost.com
bhadaway at gmail.com


*Socialize:* Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/calmestghost> |
Twitter<http://twitter.com/calmestghost> |
LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/calmestghost> |
Google+<https://plus.google.com/104582075016689917593>



On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com> wrote:

> Not exactly. Since the PHP functions you are using is derivative from
> WordPress itself and also because most themes fork at least portions of
> code from other themes, the license under which this code must be licensed
> is GPL.
> Parts of your theme like HTML code, scripts, stylesheets or even PHP code
> that has not been forked can be licensed under any compatible license
> including open source, but the code that is derivative must be licensed
> under the same license as its legacy product.
> I studied this because at one point I also thought about releasing my
> themes under more liberal licenses but realized this causes conflicts with
> legacy code.
>
> Daniel
>
> On Aug 9, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Bryan Hadaway wrote:
>
> Interesting. Do you know of any other themes/plugins that have done this?
> Any downsides (in your opinion)? I use Public Domain for everything I do
> except WP, because it's way easier and friendlier than the GPL, you can't
> get friendlier than Public Domain, but I'd always assumed you had to use
> GPL, mandatory, only reason I ever used it.
>
> But, if you just need to be GPL-compatible there are probably hundreds of
> things you could do, including writing your own license so long as it stays
> GPL-compatible. To me Public Domain is beautiful, simply put it's "Here you
> go, I made this, do what you want with it. THE END" - It seems like the
> purest form of sharing there is.
>
> I guess my concern is this, why aren't more people doing it? Why is
> everyone so stressed over the GPL if they can just release their work with
> no license. Are they just not aware or is there a side to this I'm missing?
>
> Thanks, Bryan
>
>
> Bryan Phillip Hadaway
>
> Web & Graphic Designer
> calmestghost.com
> bhadaway at gmail.com
>
> *Socialize:* Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/calmestghost> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/calmestghost> |
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/calmestghost> | Google+<https://plus.google.com/104582075016689917593>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I had a GPL question I personally never saw discussed before if anyone
>> knows
>> > the answer. Is declaring Public Domain or No License (meaning there are
>> no
>> > restrictions whatsoever) compatible with GPL?
>>
>> Yes. With any version. You may consider this answer as definitive on
>> the subject.
>>
>> -Otto
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120809/f2ca837b/attachment.htm>