[theme-reviewers] font license

[Justin Tadlock]

I responded in-ticket as well.  I just wanted to note the theme you 
reviewed was not a copy of the Hybrid theme.  The theme was built from 
the Hybrid Core framework, which you can find here:
http://themehybrid.com/hybrid-core

On 8/4/2012 6:14 AM, Chandra Maharzan wrote:
> Another question.
>
> I reviewed a theme, he has couple of changes in functions.php with his
> theme slug prefixes and design looks different as well. I reviewed
> quite a bit when I landed to one file, I saw it was calling
> hybrid_functions only to later find out all the folder/file structures
> remained unchanged as in Hybrid theme we have in the repo. Should we
> even review themes like this? I suggested him to make child theme.
> What is the norm? I know GPL allows people to make copies but whats
> the limit? The funny thing is he has ©copyright in his custom
> functions!
>
> Wasted quite sometime here. :(
>
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Chandra Maharzan <maharzan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Emil. :)
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>>> OFL http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL is all
>>> good.
>>>
>>> Emil
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Chandra Maharzan <maharzan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Just a question, people are adding fonts that says OFL license. Is
>>>> this okay with GPL2 ?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> cmans
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> cmans
>
>