[theme-reviewers] font license

[Chandra Maharzan]

Another question.

I reviewed a theme, he has couple of changes in functions.php with his
theme slug prefixes and design looks different as well. I reviewed
quite a bit when I landed to one file, I saw it was calling
hybrid_functions only to later find out all the folder/file structures
remained unchanged as in Hybrid theme we have in the repo. Should we
even review themes like this? I suggested him to make child theme.
What is the norm? I know GPL allows people to make copies but whats
the limit? The funny thing is he has ©copyright in his custom
functions!

Wasted quite sometime here. :(

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Chandra Maharzan <maharzan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Emil. :)
>
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>> OFL http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL is all
>> good.
>>
>> Emil
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Chandra Maharzan <maharzan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just a question, people are adding fonts that says OFL license. Is
>>> this okay with GPL2 ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> cmans
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> cmans



-- 
cmans